Google: We Should Not Be Subject To British Privacy Law

Google lawyers have allegedly suggested the company is not subject to UK privacy laws and so should not have to deal with claims it circumvented Apple Safari privacy protections to enable tracking of users.

Lawyers made the assertion Google should only be challenged in its home state of California, in response to claims by three people who said their privacy was infringed by the company’s actions, according to the law firm representing them.

Google cookie crumbling

Google has already paid out $22.5 million in the US, for circumventing a default privacy setting in Safari that blocked third-party cookies. Law firm Olswang was brought in to help UK users fight Google in court, although the company has now removed the code used to get cookies on users’ machines.

“Google’s position on the law is the same as its position on tax: they will only play or pay on their home turf,” said one complainant, Judith Vidal-Hall.

“What are they suggesting- that they will force Apple users whose privacy was violated to pay to travel to California to take action when they offer a service in this country on a site?”

Marc Bradshaw, another claimant, added: “It seems to us absurd to suggest that consumers can’t bring a claim against a company which is operating in the UK and is even constructing a $1 billion headquarters in London.

“If consumers can’t bring a civil claim against a company in a country where it operates, the only way of ensuring it behaves is by having a robust regulator.”

He said the UK regulator, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), did not have enough power to punish Google adequately, noting it can only fine companies up to £500,000.

“Google earns more than the maximum fine in less than two hours,” Bradshaw added.

Google had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.

Are you a pedant on privacy issues? Try our quiz!

Thomas Brewster

Tom Brewster is TechWeek Europe's Security Correspondent. He has also been named BT Information Security Journalist of the Year in 2012 and 2013.

View Comments

  • A bit crass of the lawyers. Of course any company or individual has to answer to the country,consumers and the law they doing business in - including privacy requirements.

    What happened to 'Do no harm'?

  • Google is getting more and more Evil, it automatically logs you in the youtube for their advertisers.

    It also gives information to the Spy agencies and have updated the terms and condition to say that any contents you upload belongs to Google and it can be used against you without your concent.

    What happened to 'Do no Evil' .. i think it should be changed to 'Do only Evil'.

    I think Google has lost its mojo and now just want to take over the world....


  • I think UK government should make them follow UK privacy laws, they are above the law and if they are doing business and making money from UK then they should follow the UK law as well. You can't have double standards for US company... Otherwise UK should block Google for temporary basis until they agree like China otherwise Google is keep going in circles because they have the money to delay and use excuses all the time...

Recent Posts

Musk Tesla Share Sale Surpasses $10bn

Elon Musk's Tesla share sell-off surpasses $10 billion as it reaches into fourth consecutive week,…

5 mins ago

Uber To Pay $9m Settlement Over Safety Reporting Failure

Uber agrees to pay $9 million to settle dispute with California regulators over its failure…

36 mins ago

Didi Global To Delist From New York Stock Exchange

Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Global to exit New York Stock Exchange only months after disastrous…

1 hour ago

Russia Seeks To Fine Google, Meta On Annual Turnover

Russian regulator applies to court to fine US tech giants percentage of annual Russian turnover,…

3 days ago