HP Launches Containerised, Green ‘EcoPOD’

Hewlett-Packard executives are launching a new modular data centre offering that can be deployed and run at a fraction of the capital and power costs of a traditional facility.

HP, which five years ago joined a growing number of systems vendors that began offering modular, containerised data centres with its POD (Performance Optimised Data Centre), unveiled its latest offering at its HP Discover 2011 event in Las Vegas.

Lower costs

The POD 240a – which HP officials also call the “EcoPOD” – is designed to enable businesses to get a new data centre more quickly, and run it at much lower costs than they would with brick-and-mortar facilities, according to Mark Potter, vice president and general manager of HP’s Industry Standard Servers and Software unit.

The comparisons are stark, Potter said during a 6 June webcast from the event. It takes about two years to build a relatively small data centre at a cost of $33m (£20m), he said. It also costs about $1.54 million a year to power the building, which usually has a PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness) rating of about 2.4. The PUE is a metric used to measure the energy efficiency of a building based on a ratio of the amount of energy that comes into a building and how much of that energy is actually used to run the systems. The closer to 1 that score is, the better.

By contrast, an EcoPod – which will be generally available in North America by the end of the year – will cost about $8.3 million, will cost about $55,200 for power every year and can be deployed in about 12 weeks. It will have a PUE of about 1.05, Potter said.

The EcoPod will be entirely self-contained, with the capacity for up to 4,400 servers in up to 44 standard 50U racks, and will offer the same capabilities in 900 square feet that traditional data centres have in 10,000 square feet. A key will be the use of HP’s Adaptive Cooling technology, developed in part by HP Labs. The technology optimises energy savings based on IT workloads, climate and policy by adjusting cooling methods, including outside air. That enables businesses to drive down energy costs by as much as 95 percent over typical data centres.

The new POD is part of HP’s larger Converged Infrastructure programme, and comes at a time when the rapid growth of data – driven in large part by web browsers and mobile computing – is increasing the demand on data centres, creating what Potter called a “capacity crisis”.

Fast delivery

Businesses are being forced to quickly adapt to this demand and the ensuing changes, and waiting two years for an expensive and power-hungry data centre won’t work anymore, he said. HP sees the EcoPOD – like its other modular data centres – as able to fill a number of roles, including as a new data centre, to add capacity to an existing facility or for disaster recovery.

Most vendors – including IBM, Dell, SGI and Cisco Systems – have similar offerings, the first of which was Sun Microsystems’ Project Blackbox, introduced in 2006. Potter argued that despite the other offerings, HP’s was the most complete, thanks to its broad portfolio of product lines.

The ability to deliver the technology quickly is key, Potter said, noting that in the fall of 2010, HP was able to deliver 40,000 servers to Microsoft in 22 PODs in nine weeks for the software giant’s expanded cloud-computing efforts.

“We’re the only ones with the experience to bring it all together,” he said.

Jeffrey Burt

Jeffrey Burt is a senior editor for eWEEK and contributor to TechWeekEurope

View Comments

  • A very brave statement to make given that 4,400 servers into 44 racks equals 100 per 50U rack (1/2U per server) so these would be standard web servers? and that's without any networking equipment too!!

    Or is this more likely some hype & (mis)use of reporting media in trying to maximising a claim in that the racks hold servers that therein run virtual servers and thus enqable the 4,400 claim? My math may not be that great but 40 x HP Blade enclosures with 8 servers each running 14 virtuals = 4480 and also provides 4 racks for networking and any firewall equipment too. Sadly though, there isn't room in this equation for any SAN (which the virtuals need to be effective).

    I'm sure we'd all love to see the in depth figures of such a system - what servers / networking / SAN these 44 racks provide - if HP would be so kind? So we can see what kind of systems could run on these servers?

    Perhaps I am being a tad too sceptical on marketing hype?

  • HP has got back to us and they do indeed have two servers per U of rack space. From an HP spokesman:

    "Compared to a traditional brick and mortar data center, the EcoPOD supplies the same IT capacity but in one-tenth the space. In approximately 900 square feet, it can fit up to 4,400 servers. Our racks are industry standard 50u racks and can accommodate any industry standard based gear. Because of the closely coupled cooling, customers can get up to an estimated 69kW peak in a rack, much greater than a conventional rack.

    "Server capacity here is based on HP ProLiant SL 170s with two servers per rack unit. Capacity can be higher utilizing such products as HP ProLiant BL 2x220. (up to 7,040) or utilizing other denser servers."

Recent Posts

Microsoft Beats Expectations Thanks To AI Investments

Customer adoption of AI services embedded in cloud services continues to deliver results for Microsoft,…

8 hours ago

Google Delays Removal Of Third-Party Cookies, Again

For third time Google delays phase-out of third-party Chrome cookies after pushback from industry and…

1 day ago