A German court has found in favour of Siemens, in a case that critics say will allow patentability of any kind of software in that country, contrary to the stated policy of the European Union.
The ruling allows Siemens a patent for a “client-server software for the automatic generation of structured documents (such as XML or HTML)” according to analysis by open source campaigner Florian Mueller on the FOSS Patents blog. The full court statement has been published by End Software Patent
“This decision has the effect that in Germany, a country in which software patents were previously only considered valid under relatively strict criteria, all software ideas are now potentially patentable as long as they are innovative from a purely formal point of view,” said Mueller.
This means that software which is only marginally different from how things were solved before can be patented.
Software patents are widely allowed in the US, but after a large campaign, they were rejected in the European Union five years ago, on the grounds that they would stifle innovation.
Software patents could be used to patent business methods, an idea which is currently being tested by the on-going Bilski case in the US, on which the US Supreme Court is due to rule in the next few weeks.
“Basically, Germany has now had its own Bilski case – with the worst possible outcome for the opponents of software patents,” said Mueller. “While the Bilski patent relates to a software-implemented business method and the German decision relates to automated document generation, either case is key in its respective jurisdiction for defining the limits of patentable subject matter in connection with software.
“Five years ago, the push for European software patents hit a snag: the European Parliament threw out a proposal that would have ‘codified’ [turned into an EU law] the pro-software-patent position.” said Mueller. “Now 2010 looks like the year in which the proponents of software patents get their way at all levels.”
Mueller is the founder of the NSoftwarePatents campaign, and has spoken out on many open source issues including the future of the open source database MySQL, following the acquisition of Sun by Oracle.
The Free Software Foundation partly funded a film earlier this year, illustrating what it calls the “patent absurdity” of software patents.
Thoma Bravo agrees to acquire Darktrace for $5.32 billion in cash, delivering some welcome news…
Customer adoption of AI services embedded in cloud services continues to deliver results for Microsoft,…
TikTok's 'secret source' algorithm is so core to ByteDance, it would rather shut down US…
After relocating from California to Texas in 2020, Oracle's Larry Ellison now reveals plan to…
Share price hit after Meta admits heavy AI spending plans, after posting strong first quarter…
For third time Google delays phase-out of third-party Chrome cookies after pushback from industry and…
View Comments
Does this court have the jurisdiction or the authority to make such a sweeping decision??
Seems to me this should be a legislative matter, not something for some court to decide.
@wvhillbilly
The above article talks about how the court has introduced new "case law". Nothing has actually been changed in the books.
Courts are always going backward and forwards on things.
Hopefully one day, when judges "get with the times", they will realise that software is nothing more than maths.
Hi, this is Daniel North.ut after a large campaign, they were rejected in the European Union five years ago, on the grounds that they would stifle innovation.
for defining the limits of patentable subject matter in connection with software.
=========================
Daniel North