Apple has been dealt a damaging blow after a federal judge ruled that the iPad maker had conspired with five publishers to fix the prices of ebooks, when it entered the Amazon-dominated market in 2010.
US District Court Judge Denise Cote’s 10 July ruling came after a three-week trial in June, during which federal prosecutors argued that Apple played a central role in a conspiracy with the publishers to drive up the prices of ebooks beyond the $9.99 (£6.60) set by Amazon, the dominant ebook seller at the time.
Cote said the federal government and several states that acted as plaintiffs in the case were entitled to injunctive relief. The date for a trial to determine damages will be set later.
In her 160-page ruling, the judge rejected claims by Apple’s attorneys that the consumer tech giant should not be held responsible for any price fixing that the publishers may have done, and that Apple executives were unaware that the publishers – after meeting with Apple regarding ebooks and the company’s upcoming iPad tablet – threatened to withhold books from Amazon.
The judge noted that publishers had been grating on Amazon’s $9.99 pricing for many top best sellers and had been pushing the online retail giant to increase prices. Amazon officials pushed back against the pressure, and publishers feared retaliation if they threaten to withhold books from Amazon, which had begun selling ebooks in 2007 with the introduction of its Kindle e-reader.
However, Apple’s desire to announce an iBookstore at the same time it unveiled the iPad in January 2010 changed the dynamic. According to Cote, Apple executives approached the publishers and worked with them to find a way to increase the price of ebooks from $9.99 to $12.99 (£8.58) to $14.99 (£9.90). They also helped change the model used for selling ebooks, moving away from a wholesale model – where the retailer sets the price – to an agency model, where the publisher sets the price and the retailer gets a percentage cut on the books sold.
After entering the deal with Apple, the booksellers moved all of their retailers to an agency model.
“Apple seized the moment and brilliantly played its hand,” Cote wrote. “Taking advantage of the Publisher Defendants’ fear of and frustration over Amazon’s pricing, as well as the tight window of opportunity created by the impending launch of the iPad on 27 January … Apple garnered the signatures it needed to introduce the iBookstore at the Launch. … Apple not only willingly joined the conspiracy, but also forcefully facilitated it.”
Apple has yet to comment on the decision.
Page: 1 2
After Meta had warned that India's data sharing ban could collapse WhatsApp's business model, tribunal…
British regulator confirms investigation of Apple and Google's domination of app stores, operating systems, and…
Launch of Samsung's Galaxy S25 Ultra, Galaxy S25+ and Galaxy S25 sees the handsets described…
Microsoft's LinkedIn sued for allegedly using customer data, including private messages, to train AI models…
1,700 jobs to be lost in Quebec, as Amazon says it will close seven sites…
Google wins permanent injunction from London's High Court to prevent enforcement of Russian YouTube judgements