Twitter has laid down the law for developers warning it will not look kindly upon the use of its public programming kits or data from its Gnip subsidiary for surveillance purposes.
“Recent reports about Twitter data being used for surveillance, however, have caused us great concern. As a company, our commitment to social justice is core to our mission and well established. And our policies in this area are long-standing,” said Chris Moody, vice president of Data & Solutions at Twitter.
“Using Twitter’s Public APIs or data products to track or profile protesters and activists is absolutely unacceptable and prohibited.”
“We prohibit developers using the Public APIs and Gnip data products from allowing law enforcement — or any other entity — to use Twitter data for surveillance purposes. Period,” said Moody.
“The fact that our Public APIs and Gnip data products provide information that people choose to share publicly does not change our policies in this area. And if developers violate our policies, we will take appropriate action, which can include suspension and termination of access to Twitter’s Public APIs and data products.”
Twitter’s diehard approach to anti-surveillance comes at a time when Parliament passed the government’s Investigatory Powers Bill, commonly referred to as the Snooper’s Charter, which will b enshrined in UK law within a matter of weeks.
Pursuing and anti-snooping agenda will not stop governmental agencies and other surveillance firms and actors from harvesting Twitter information from other means, but the move showcases how some technology companies have the scope to champion an agenda that flies in the face of those of governments.
Are you a pedant on privacy? Try our quiz!
Google is reportedly laying off at least 200 staff from its “Core” organisation, including key…
Investor appeasement? Apple unveils huge $110 billion share buyback program, as sales of iPhone decline…
Tesla retreats from pioneering gigacasting manufacturing process, amid cost cutting and challenges at EV giant
No skynet please. After the US, UK and France pledge human only control of nuclear…
Microsoft's AI investments continue in south east Asia, after investments in Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia, as…
New chapter for LastPass as it becomes an independent company to focus on cybersecurity, after…
View Comments
How about 'name and shame' ? Companies may not be able to state when they have received an 'official' request / demand or the detail. Could they still name and shame the Twitter accounts ? At least then the public will know which names to watch for and therefore be proactive in relation to their own personal security.