This week, Elliot Associates, a hedge fund, offered to buy Novell. The offer signals a bid to break up the company, and could be extremely bad news for open source … and also for Microsoft.
Novell has been struggling for fifteen years to find a coherent role, having abandoned its effort to destroy Micrsoft in head-on competition. In the last few years, after its successful purchase of SUSE and Ximian in 2003, it has been a leading player in open source – albeit one whose credibility is tainted for some by its support deal with Microsoft.
Elliot Associates’ bid to buy Novell emerged this week and amounts to a rather low offer for a company which has $1 billion in the bank. Elliot has a reputation as a “vulture capitalist”, and is expected to simply break the company up, sell the parts and pocket a profit if the deal goes through.
But is that really the most likely result? There’s a fascinating explanation of the hostile-bid process on the Standards Blog of technology lawyer Andy Updegrove, which outlines several possibilities, and makes the point that “one of the companies that may have the most to lose if Elliott acquires Novell is Microsoft”.
Elliot is in a position of strength, and can effectively try to force Novell’s board to agree to the bid, because they all have a legal liability, and might face a shareholder revolt if they turn down a good bid. Alternatively, Elliot can wait for the price of Novell shares to go up (inevitable, given it has offered money for it) and then simply walk away. It could then sell the eight percent of the company it already owns for a profit, and leave the Novell board the task of convincing the world it’s not a lame duck.
That’s not a great position to be in, and the open source chief at Sun couldn’t resist a swift jibe on his blog: “Seems even with Microsoft’s support Novell couldn’t cut it.” A remark that looks ill-judged, given that Sun itself couldn’t survive on its own, and Phipps may find that his company’s new owner, Oracle, has misgivings about open source.
To avoid meltdown or asset-stripping, Novell can try and find a preferred bidder – a company with some interest in running Novell as a business, and preferrably a tech company. Or another company may make a move independently. But who might that be?
Page: 1 2
New chapter for LastPass as it becomes an independent company to focus on cybersecurity, after…
US FCC seeks to ban Chinese telecom firms at centre of national security concerns from…
Two updates to Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude sees arrival of a new business-focused plan, as…
Most people in the United States view TikTok as a Chinese influence tool a poll…
UK regulator confirms it is investigating whether OnlyFans is doing enough to prevent children accessing…
Dismissed staff file complaint with a US labor board, and allege Google unlawfully terminated their…
View Comments
If Microsoft or IBM buy Novell then they would have an Identity Management product that actually works. Then they could get rid of ILM or TIM TAM which don't work nearly as well as Novell IDM.
I agree with your conclusion. Novell had its day with suse and performed poorly. Its time to pass the ball. I would not be surprised to see suse rebranded to Microsoft Linux, GPL and all. It's time for Microsoft to make a bold move. They've been coasting on their success for too long.
why the fuck would Novell be stupid enough to even Consider this!? They are thriving as a Business.... I can't see Novell Selling up and packing their bags.... They have got too much of a bright future ahead
Unfortunately Novell is not as thriving as Redhat and others, and their deal with Microsoft is due to run out.
However that isn't the issue. This is a hostile takeover bid. It is the Novell shareholders to whom this takeover will appeal, not the Novell board.
why would microsoft buy novell and rebrand suse. that would be competing against themselves. no one uses netware anymore except some pharma and other hippa companies. maybe make suse crippleware, which it is close to now imho. red hat might could, but then how is that all absorbed into the company, already with a brand of their own. hhmm perhaps it should just ride itself out. suse was a great distro back in the day. some move on some don't.