Microsoft faced another setback in a long-running intellectual property case on 11 May, when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office confirmed the validity of a patent allegedly infringed by the software giant. Canadian firm i4i insists that both Microsoft Word 2003 and 2007 violate its patent’s custom XML-related properties.
The twists and turns of the case extend back to August 2009, when a federal judge in the U.S. District Court in Eastern Texas ordered Microsoft to pull copies of Word from store shelves within 90 days and pay i4i damages for allegedly violating U.S. Patent 5,787,499. Microsoft immediately filed an appeal, but the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided to uphold the verdict in December. Microsoft responded to that setback by asking for a review of the decision by all 11 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and by issuing a patch that would supposedly sidestep the alleged infringement.
On 1 April, Microsoft was denied a multiple-judge review of the lawsuit. While reports at the time indicated that Microsoft had the option of taking the case to the Supreme Court, the company remained vague about its plans.
For its part, i4i seemed pleased with this latest development in the case. “This is a very material step in our litigation against Microsoft,” Loudon Owen, chairman of i4i, wrote in an 11 May statement. “Put simply: i4i’s patent is clearly and unequivocally valid. Even though Microsoft attacked i4i’s patent claims with its full arsenal, the Patent Office agreed with i4i and confirmed the validity of our ‘449 patent.’”
Owen explained that the patent “infuses life into the use of Extensible Mark Up Language (XML) and dramatically enhances the ability to structure what was previously unstructured data. As the magnitude of data grows exponentially, this is a critical technological bridge to controlling and managing this sprawling octopus of data and converting it into useful information.”
If i4i seemed pleased, Microsoft was just as understandably frustrated by the decision.
“We are disappointed,” Kevin Kutz, Microsoft’s director of public affairs, wrote in an 11 May statement, “but there still remain important matters of patent law at stake, and we are considering our options to get them addressed, including a petition to the Supreme Court.”
While many intellectual property cases have a propensity to be settled out of court, previous interviews with i4i executives indicated a willingness to contest the matter through the legal system. “Where we come from, if someone tries to take something that belongs to you, you stand up to them; you don’t just reach for the calculator,” Owen told eWEEK on 17 Aug., 2009. “We’re not in a position to guess or second-guess or speculate as to what the court is going to do.”
AI-generated content such as video and images are going to be labelled by TikTok using…
Neuralink brain implant embedded in 29-year-old patient named Noland Arbaugh develops a fault, but is…
US agency seeks data from Tesla on Autopilot recall, amid reports US prosecutors are probing…
The United States reportedly considers restricting China and Russia's access to AI models found in…
New child safety laws sees Ofcom calling on tech firms to “tame toxic algorithms” to…
Another u-turn? Former Twitter boss Jack Dorsey suddenly quits Bluesky's board of directors, and calls…
View Comments
Sometimes I wonder why these companies come after such a long time.
I cannot help but these patents are getting into the way of development in IT area. Companies focus on protecting and harbouring patents instead of developing their products and services.
Do not like it.