Marketing Firm Goes Into Liquidation After ‘Record’ £350,000 ICO Fine

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has handed out a record £350,000 fine to a lead generation firm responsible for 46 million automated calls, but Brighton-based Prodial has responded by going into liquidation.

According to the ICO investigation, Prodial used IP phone lines to make enormous numbers of calls about PPI claims. Recipients were bombarded with nuisance communications and had no way of opting out.

Prodial was based at a residential property and hid its numbers to make it difficult to report the calls. In total, the ICO received 1,000 complaints from people who said they were contacted day and night, with one doctor stating it was interfering with his job because had to answer all calls in case one was an emergency.

Nuisance call fine

“This is one of the worst cases of cold calling we have ever come across. The volume of calls made in just a few months was staggering,” said Information Commissioner Christopher Graham. “This was a company that knew it was breaking the law.

“A company director admitted that once the ICO became involved, the company shut down. That stopped the calls, but we want to send a clear message to other firms that this type of law-breaking will not pay. That is why we have handed out our highest ever fine.”

The ICO says it is working with liquidators to recover the fine, noting that the marketing campaign undertaken by Prodial could be worth as much as £1 million in revenues.

To prevent the inconvience and stress of nuisance calls, the government has proposed that all direct marketing companies should be legally obligated to display their phone numbers when contacting the public.

Telecoms firms including BT and TalkTalk have taken measures to help block and blacklist offending numbers but even operators aren’t entirely innocent. In 2013, Ofcom fined TalkTalk £750,000 for making excessive numbers of nuisance calls to prospective customers in 2011.

What do you know about ICO and its counterparts? Take our quiz!

Steve McCaskill

Steve McCaskill is editor of TechWeekEurope and ChannelBiz. He joined as a reporter in 2011 and covers all areas of IT, with a particular interest in telecommunications, mobile and networking, along with sports technology.

View Comments

  • The real solution is to also make the people/firms responsible for employing the marketing firms legally liable as well.

Recent Posts

Google, DOJ Closing Arguments Clash Over Search ‘Monopoly’

Google clashes with US Justice Department in closing arguments as government argues Google used illegal…

3 hours ago

Stanford AI Scientist Working On ‘Spatial Intelligence’ Start-Up

Prominent Stanford University AI scientist Fei-Fei Li reportedly completes funding round for start-up based on…

4 hours ago

Apple Shares Surge Ahead Of New AI Hardware Launches

Apple shares surge on optimism that new AI-focused hardware launches will drive renewed sales, starting…

4 hours ago

Biden Vetoes Republican Measure In Row Over Contractors’ Unions

Biden vetoes Republican-backed measure amidst dispute over 'joint employer' status for contract workers, affecting tech…

5 hours ago

Lawyers Say Strict Child Controls In China Show TikTok Could Do Better

Lawyers in US social media addiction action say strict controls on Douyin in China show…

5 hours ago

London Black Cabs Sue Uber In Latest Legal Tangle

More than 10,000 London black cab drivers sue Uber claiming company acted illegally to obtain…

6 hours ago