US Supreme Court To Hear Facebook Shareholder Suit Appeal

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case by Meta Platforms subsidiary Facebook in its effort to dismiss a shareholder lawsuit that accused the company of misleading investors over the Cambridge Analytica data-sharing scandal in 2017 and 2018.

The suit alleges that long after the data breach became known to Facebook leadership, the company continued to mention the possible harm from such a breach in hypothetical terms in documents such as regulatory filings.

The court’s decision, expected next year, could redefine standards for the disclosure of damaging information in such Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings.

Facebook agreed in 2019 to pay $5.1 billion (£4bn) in civil penalties to settle charges by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the SEC over the scandal and paid more than $725m to settle a separate class-action lawsuit by users.

Image credit: Facebook

Data access scandal

The shareholder lawsuit was brought in California by investors led by Amalgamated Bank in 2018 after Facebook’s share price dropped following reports that political consultancy Cambridge Analytica had improperly accessed millions of users’ data in connection with Donald Trump’s successful 2016 presidential bid.

The data of as many as 87 million users were involved.

The plaintiffs modified the lawsuit later in the year to reflect a second share price drop on reports Facebook had shared user data with dozens of third parties without proper user consent.

The suit, which seeks unspecified monetary damages, alleges Facebook leadership knew of Cambridge Analytica’s improper data access as far back as 2015.

Corporate risk

US District Judge Edward Davila dismissed the lawsuit in 2021 but it was later restored by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.

“The problem is that Facebook represented the risk of improper access to or disclosure of Facebook user data as purely hypothetical when that exact risk had already transpired,” wrote Judge Margaret McKeown in the latter decision.

Facebook said the 9th Circuit’s decision would “force public companies to inform investors of past incidents that pose no known threat to the business”.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Hackers ‘Publish Walt Disney Internal Slack Data’

Hackers reportedly publish data from thousands of Disney internal Slack communications, including data on strategy…

6 hours ago

Apple Shares Reach All-Time High On AI Optimism

Apple shares surge after Morgan Stanley rates company 'top pick' over AI plans and says…

6 hours ago

Musk Confirms Robotaxi Delay For Design Change

Elon Musk confirms delay of Tesla robotaxi launch as company's shares surge after he publicly…

7 hours ago

Silicon UK In Focus Podcast: The Value of Data

Discover the transformative power of data in our latest podcast. Learn how leveraging data can…

7 hours ago

Smartphone Market Recovery Heading For ‘Slow, Steady Growth’

Global smartphone market shows growth for third consecutive quarter as it recovers from weakest year…

7 hours ago

Huawei Completes Massive $1.4bn R&D Campus With ‘100 Cafes’

Huawei Technologies completes work on massive centralised R&D campus as it seeks to develop domestic…

8 hours ago