Google is at the High Court in London this week as it seeks to halt a lawsuit filed against it by Max Mosley, the former F1 boss.
Mosley had initially filed his lawsuit against Google in late 2011, after he objected to the embarrassing search results the search engine reveals when users do a Google search on his name.
Mosley is perhaps best known as the former president of Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA), the governing body for Formula One and other international motorsports. However, he is well used to the courts as he is a former barrister.
In 2008, pictures of Mosley involved in an orgy was published by the Rupert Murdoch’s now-defunct News of the World newspaper. Mosley successfully sued the News of the World for invasion of privacy in July 2008 and was awarded £60,000 ($91,290), plus costs.
Mosley made his appearance in court on Wednesday, and argues the firm is breaching his fundamental right to privacy by allowing users to access the pictures.
Google meanwhile wants Britain’s High Court to rule that it does not have a legal obligation to monitor and limit the flow of data on the Internet.
The outcome of the latest case could set a UK legal precedent in enforcing privacy online, according to the Guardian newspaper. It centres over the fact whether Google can be regarded as a publisher of information.
The newspaper quoted Antony White QC, for Google, said that the internet company was applying to have the case struck out. He argued that information about the sex party is already in the public domain and Mosley therefore no longer had any legitimate expectation of privacy in relation to photographs. “The dam has effectively burst,” White reportedly said.
Google’s counsel argued that as the images had been viewed by 435,000 people and 1.5 million had seen the video footage, Mosley could not realistically expect to regain his privacy.
“There are 40,000 searches [on Google] a second and three and a half billion a day,” said White. “To suggest that there is any knowing involvement [in publication] is totally artificial. The index [of searches] is provided wholly automatically by crawling through the web. It an algorithmic operation without human involvement.”
But Mosley’s lawyer struck back. “We say that [Google are] publishers because they continue to make [the photographs] available on the search engine site,” Hugh Tomlinson QC, for Mosley, told the court. “The issue is about under what circumstances they are a publisher.”
Google has also fought against the “right to be forgotten” ruling by Court of Justice of the European Union last year.
That ruling allows people to request the removal of hyperlinks about themselves. Google reluctantly compiled, but quickly found itself swamped with ‘right to be forgotten’ requests. Google said at the time that most of those requests tend to come from people wishing to remove links to articles about fraud or scams, or arrests or convictions for serious offences.
What do you know about Europe’s role in Tech history? Take our quiz!
Troubled chip giant Intel will invest more than $28 billion to construct two new chip…
In Q3 Apple rejoins ranks of top five smartphone makers in China, as government welcomes…
IT spending growth in 2025 comes as CIOs move from proof-of-concept, and begin investment into…
Industry supply chain analyst says Apple cut orders for the iPhone 16 for Q4 2024…
Heavy fine for LinkedIn, after Irish data protection watchdog cites GDPR violations with people's personal…
UK competition regulator begins phase one investigation into Alphabet's partnership with AI startup Anthropic
View Comments
Google is a Publisher because they utilize the content to make ad revenue like any other publication. They also employ thousands of human site rankers through contracting firms like LeapForce among many others to crawl and rank site content, so both their arguments are false. They make money like any other publisher of content, and it's not all just automated algorithms, there are many many humans involved in the content search process. They also illegally invade privacy by recording conversations that are occurring around your phone, not just while you are on your phone. They do this through their apps where the settings automatically use your microphone and are set to run in the background. The YouTube app is set up this way on the iPhone for example. They are now using those private ambient conversations to initiate teleports to auto dial you to sell you a certain product moments after you've mentioned certain keywords.