Three companies that had accused IBM of anticompetitive behaviour in its mainframe business are dropping the complaints they had filed with the European Union.
According to a recent regulatory filing by IBM, two of the companies – T3 Technologies and Neon Enterprise Software – either have or will withdraw their complaints with European regulators. Meanwhile, officials with a third company – TurboHercules – said they were no longer pursuing their complaint against IBM and its mainframe business.
IBM officials declined to comment on the issue.
Both T3 and TurboHercules also offered technology designed to make it easier for businesses to run their mainframe workloads on non-IBM systems.
The complaints filed by the three companies kicked off at least two EU investigations into IBM’s mainframe business practices. European regulators were noncommittal about whether they would continue the investigations in light of the complaints being dropped. T3 and Neon also had filed complaints with US regulators.
Essentially, all the complaints were the same: They accused IBM of antitrust behaviour regarding its mainframe business, saying the tech giant used its dominant position to unfairly hurt their companies by tying their System z machines to its mainframe operating systems. IBM officials argued that the companies’ products violated IBM patents and, if used, would cause mainframe customers to violate the terms of their licensing deals with IBM. The smaller companies essentially were trying to make money off the billions of dollars IBM had invested in the mainframe business, Big Blue officials said.
In addition, IBM accused competitors – in particular, Microsoft – of backing the regulatory complaints for competitive reasons.
Despite the contention among some industry observers that mainframe systems were being squeezed out by the rise of more powerful x86 systems, IBM’s System z servers continue to be an important part of IBM’s hardware portfolio. In the second quarter, IBM’s System z mainframe revenues rose 61 percent over the same period last year, while MIPS jumped 86 percent.
The products put forth by Neon, T3 and TurboHercules were designed to help businesses continue to run their mainframe workloads, but for less money.
Neon’s zPrime software’s ability to use less costly IBM systems contrasts with T3’s ability to make non-mainframe systems that can run mainframe applications. TurboHercules’ emulation software – based on the open-source Hercules technology – also enabled businesses to run their mainframe applications on less costly servers, including mainstream x86 systems.
Neon in 2009 sued IBM, and IBM later counter-sued. In May, Neon officials announced they had settled their legal disputes with IBM and shelved zPrime. A US District Court judge earlier had ruled that only those workloads that IBM allowed could run on the specialty engines and that System z customers using technology like zPrime were violating their licences with IBM.
The IBM settlement does not impact any other Neon products other than zPrime, Neon officials said.
German foreign minister warns Russia will face consequences for “absolutely intolerable” cyberattack on ruling party,…
Google is reportedly laying off at least 200 staff from its “Core” organisation, including key…
Investor appeasement? Apple unveils huge $110 billion share buyback program, as sales of iPhone decline…
Tesla retreats from pioneering gigacasting manufacturing process, amid cost cutting and challenges at EV giant
No skynet please. After the US, UK and France pledge human only control of nuclear…
Microsoft's AI investments continue in south east Asia, after investments in Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia, as…
View Comments
It is about time IBM offers cost reduction themselves - now they are just using the monopoly power to survive making the hurt CEO WANT to move away ASAP