Categories: SecurityWorkspace

Hackers Bring Down Mastercard Site

Mastercard’s website was down for a period on Tuesday, in an apparent denial of service attack .

The sporadic loss of service appears to be due to “hacktivists” who previously attacked Mastercard in December, following the finance firm’s refusal to handle donations to the whistleblowing site WikiLeaks. At the time of writing, the site is running again.

Sporadic problems on Mastercard

The attack was from WikiLeaks supporters, according to a tweet claiming responsibility, from @ibomhacktivist:  “MasterCard.com DOWN!!!, thats what you get when you mess with @wikileaks @Anon_Central and the enter community of lulz loving individuals :D”

The hacking group Anonymous led the original strike on Mastercard, directing masses of meaningless traffic to block the site in a “denial of service” attack which also struck at PayPal and the Swiss bank PostFinance for the same reason.

“We’ve seen plenty of headlines over the past couple of months about high profile hacking incidents and unfortunately, the momentum doesn’t seem to be slowing,” said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at security firm Sophos.

These attacks are viewed by some as non-violent protests, but are illegal, Cluley said. British police have arrested five  suspects for possible involvement in the earlier attacks.

“This should be a wakeup call for us all when it comes to internet security,” said Cluley. “While there’s obviously a vast contrast between DDoS attacks and the bad guys looking to steal sensitive information for financial gain, the biggest concern is the attitude towards these attacks, with hackers portraying that it’s all a bit of fun.  Companies and computer users mustn’t sit back and laugh along, thinking that these attacks won’t affect them.”

The word “lulz” in @ibomhacktivist’s tweet is reference to the Lulzsec group which disbanded on Saturday, after a 50-day campaign of mischief which included publishing user passwords and personal details online. While some security experts regard Lulzsec’s activity as a useful wake-up call, others believe it overstepped the mark by stealing and exposing personal details.

Peter Judge

Peter Judge has been involved with tech B2B publishing in the UK for many years, working at Ziff-Davis, ZDNet, IDG and Reed. His main interests are networking security, mobility and cloud

Recent Posts

Anthropic Launches Enterprise-Focused Claude, Plus iPhone App

Two updates to Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude sees arrival of a new business-focused plan, as…

24 mins ago

TikTok Viewed As Chinese Influence Tool By Most Americans – Poll

Most people in the United States view TikTok as a Chinese influence tool a poll…

15 hours ago

Ofcom Confirms OnlyFans Investigation Over Age Verification

UK regulator confirms it is investigating whether OnlyFans is doing enough to prevent children accessing…

15 hours ago

Ex Google Staff Fired Over Israel Protest File NLRB Complaint

Dismissed staff file complaint with a US labor board, and allege Google unlawfully terminated their…

16 hours ago

Tesla Axes Entire Supercharger Team, Plus Senior Executives

Elon Musk dismisses two senior Tesla executives, plus the entire division that runs Tesla's Supercharger…

18 hours ago

Microsoft, OpenAI Sued By More Newspaper Publishers

Eight newspaper publishers in the US allege Microsoft and OpenAI used their millions of their…

19 hours ago