Government Energy Plans Could Prompt Data Centre Exodus

Data centre operators have become the latest group to threaten to quit the UK over government regulation of their industry.

In a statement released this week – reminiscent of the threats made by some financial services firms that they would quit the country over banking taxes and other regulations – data centre specialists have warned that the coalition government’s recently announced energy policies could prompt an exodus of computing facility operators for more favourable climes.

Alex Rabbetts, managing director of data centre company Migration Solutions, said he was extremely concerned by the government’s recent energy statement. He cited a section of the statement which allegedly promised that domestic bills would only rise by 1 percent by 2020 while business’ bills would rise by up to 43 percent as policies are implemented to reduce carbon emissions.

Moving Off-Shore

Alex Rabbetts

“This pricing difference between business and home users will definitely make data centre companies think about moving off-shore to more attractive energy locations, like France or Germany,” said Rabbetts.

Liam Newcombe, one of the founders of the data centre specialist group at the British Computer Society and also co-founder of data centre analysis specialist Romonet, agreed with the issues raised by Rabbetts. He said that concerns about the energy policy voiced by Migration Solutions were also valid for the UK’s Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) legislation and energy policies in general.

“Between the CRC and the lack of any structured energy policy in the UK we do appear to have a problem,” he said. “We appear to be heading for a power generating capacity shortfall which has resulted in this need to raise prices. The combination of rising cost and complex regulatory burdens may well be the tipping factor for operators building in the UK versus elsewhere.”

To address the issue, Newcombe said data centre groups, and industry body Intellect, are working with the Department of Energy and Climate Change on an Climate Change Agreement (CCA) as an alternative to CRC for data centres.

Carbon reduction

The Carbon Reduction Commitment is a “cap and trade” scheme designed to reduce the amount of energy used by the largest energy consumers in the country. Although it has already started, very few organisations have registered – even though failure to comply with the rules could eventually mean a £50,000 fine, according to some experts.

According to figures cited by Migration Solutions, a data centre can use up to 50 times as much power as the equivalent business office space and an average facility in the UK will pay a power bill of around £1million per year.

While admitting that data centres do consume large amounts of energy, Rabbetts was keen to point out that applications and communications technologies they support – such as video conferencing and remote collaboration tools – are a substitute for carbon intensive air-travel for example.

“Undoubtedly Data Centres do use a lot of electricity. However, they are also key to the new low carbon economy,” said Rabbetts. “Information Technology (IT) uses 2 percent of the country’s electricity but it also provides many of the solutions that will reduce our domestic power consumption and carbon emissions.”

Rabbets also cited the recently announced UK smart-meter and grid roll-out – which the government claims will contribute to the overall target of its energy policy to cut carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050. The government published the energy policy – alongside a prospectus on the smart meter rollout – at the end of July.

“Initiatives proposed by the government such as smart meters, home-working and stream lining their ICT strategy all completely depend on the information storage and computing power of our data centres,” said Rabbetts.

EU Code Of Conduct

But while it may be possible for some data centres to be migrated abroad, issues of latency mean some facilities connected to financial services have to be situated close to where trading happens. Some reports claim that applications and services that need near “real time” communication cannot be located further than 40 miles from the hosting site.

But while Rabbetts is opposed to elements of the UK energy policy, he claimed that his organisation has been promoting the EU’s Code of Conduct for Data Centres. The code, introduced in November 2008, is a voluntary scheme to encourage data centre operators to improve energy efficiency and reduce power consumption.

Andrew Donoghue

View Comments

  • Alex needs to get realistic when he says that DC operators will move to other countries within Europe, does he not realise that the CRC is effectively european legislation and that regulation in these countries will catch up.
    Far better that he concentrate on building energy efficient data centres possibly powered by renewable energy, thus neatly solving two issues, reducing energy cost and complying with CRC.

  • While there is some merit in the argument, there is no guarantee that other EU nations or any other non-EU country will not take an aggressive stance towards penalising high energy users.
    However it is not just about energy in some cases it may not be legal to relocate data abroad.
    Nonetheless the EU Code of Conduct does provide a strong basis for energy efficienct that data centres should be adhering to, irrespective of their location.

  • Alex Rabbetts is quite right to express alarm about the new Government proposal to increase domestic electricity prices by only one per cent by 2020 whilst business electricity charges are going up by 43 per cent. Domestic users have votes - data centres don’t. Also, whilst the Government’s stated reason is to encourage carbon reduction, we all know it’s really just another tax and will more than likely go into the Treasury pot. Plus, the end result will certainly be that some companies who might have located their data centres in the UK will simply choose another country.

    But it isn’t as bad as it sounds, as all data centres aren’t the same, and don’t exist for the same reasons. Some data centres need a lot of computation power (and therefore electrical power) but have little need to communicate with the outside world. For example, this might be geological computation, with lots of number-crunching, little communications and few staff. Those kinds of data centres may leave the UK.

    However, those that are communications-heavy or latency-critical, such as algo-traders, who need super-low latency and close physical proximity to the big financial trading platforms, or telephone calling-card companies, who need myriad diverse connections at low cost to all parts of the world won’t leave. Data centres that have the best and fastest connectivity, particularly those in central London will need to remain in the capital, despite this energy hike.

    Roger Keenan
    Managing director, City Lifeline

Recent Posts

Toshiba Axes 4,000 Staff In Post-Delisting Restructuring Operation

Workforce blow. Newly privatised Toshiba has embarked on a 'revitalisation plan' that will entail the…

5 hours ago

European Union Opens Child Safety Probe Into Meta

European Commission opens an official child safety investigation into Facebook and Instagram-owner Meta Platforms

6 hours ago

Apple Store Workers Vote To Strike Over Contract Talks Delay

Workers at unionised Apple store in Maryland vote to authorise first ever strike, after delays…

10 hours ago

Business Intelligence: Next-Generation Data Analytics

Explore how cutting-edge technologies are reshaping decision-making, driving innovation, and propelling businesses into the data-driven…

12 hours ago