Microsoft ‘Has Acknowledged The Enterprise Role Of Linux’

When Novell and Microsoft signed a deal to support Windows and Linux in the enterprise, it caused a furore. Three years on, the deal shows that Microsoft really does acknowledge the value of Linux in the enterprise – at least that’s the view from the OpenSUSE community.

All open source projects have a community attached to them, and for SUSE Linux Enterprise the community version is OpenSUSE, whose community is managed by Joe “Zonker” Brockmeier.

“Community Manager is a misnomer,” Brockmeier admits, however. “It’s kind of like saying ‘cat manager’. I manage some of the events around the OpenSUSE community – for example the OpenSUSE conference, and things like the budget for any promotions around OpenSUSE.”

Most open source projects with corporate interests, like OpenSUSE OpenIngres or OpenOffice, have community managers, either officially or unoffically, he says, but their aims may differ. “Novell has the goal of increasing community participation,” he says, “but Firefox, for instance, focuses very heavily on increasing the user base – and contributors.”

The deal: Microsoft has acknowledged Linux

When Novell and Microsoft signed a support deal three years ago there was vocal criticism of Novell – but Brockmeier reckons that it has come good, showing a real change of direction for Microsoft. “It’s much less of an issue now than it was three years ago,” he says.


Join our web seminar, Bridging the Gap Between Linux and Windows, on Wednesday 9 December, and hear how to combine the two worlds


“If you go back and look at what was written about the deal at the time, at what was trying to predict what would happen, it has been wildly inaccurate,” he says.

At the time Brockmeier’s role didn’t exist, and thanks to poor communications from Novell, people with a negative view of the deal “carried the day”, even though plenty of people supported it. “Even Eben Moglen [Columbia law professor and founder of the Software Freedom Law Center] approved of the deal and said it was compliant with the GPLv2 licence agreement.”

[ Update: Joe Brockmeier has withdrawn this remark, saying “Eben is not a strong supporter of the deal”. ]

“Novell was the first company to get Microsoft to acknowledge Linux as a contender in the market – and the effect of that has been under-rated,” says Brockmeier. “Do you remember the way Microsoft used to talk about Linux? In that dismissive fashion?”

“Once you get to the point where Microsoft feels the need to deliver Linux to its customers, you have a huge tacit acknowledgement that Linux is suitable for the enterprise,” he says. “That’s an enormous thing that I don’t think Novell has gotten enough credit for.”

Page: 1 2

Peter Judge

Peter Judge has been involved with tech B2B publishing in the UK for many years, working at Ziff-Davis, ZDNet, IDG and Reed. His main interests are networking security, mobility and cloud

View Comments

  • This reads like a press release. A spokesman says the critics are wrong; nothing heard from the other side, except as reported by the self-same spokesman.

  • Thanks for the comment. This is an interview with one person - if you read the rest of our site, including articles linked from this interview, you'll find the balance you are looking for.

    Peter Judge

  • No, Prof. Moglen most emphatically did not "approve" of the deal. Matter of fact, he called Brad Smith of Microsoft and told him, "I think you should just walk away from the patent part of the deal now."

    Microsoft didn't, and the result was GPLv3, which closed the loophole that allowed such deals to come about.

    Furthermore, Prof. Moglen doesn't "see nothing but progress", as you put it. In fact, he sees the Microsoft/Novell deal, and other deals like it, as highly detrimental to Free Software.

    --SYG

  • ... so balance is found elsewhere in the site.

    We do not quote Prof Moglen as seeing "nothing but progress". That's Brockmeier speaking.

    And when I spoke to Brockmeier I did not have the facts to hand about Prof Moglen's comments on the Novell/Microsoft deal.

    Is it possible that the professor's involvement was sufficiently complex and productive that those inside the deal may have interpreted it as support?

    We're interested in more views here, and welcome volunteers for future interviews?

Recent Posts

Tesla Backs Away From Gigacasting Manufacturing – Report

Tesla retreats from pioneering gigacasting manufacturing process, amid cost cutting and challenges at EV giant

13 hours ago

US Urges No AI Control Of Nuclear Weapons

No skynet please. After the US, UK and France pledge human only control of nuclear…

14 hours ago

LastPass Separates From Parent After Security Incidents

New chapter for LastPass as it becomes an independent company to focus on cybersecurity, after…

17 hours ago

US To Ban Huawei, ZTE From Certifying Wireless Kit

US FCC seeks to ban Chinese telecom firms at centre of national security concerns from…

21 hours ago

Anthropic Launches Enterprise-Focused Claude, Plus iPhone App

Two updates to Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude sees arrival of a new business-focused plan, as…

23 hours ago