X Loses Case Against Hate-Speech Nonprofit

A US judge has dismissed a lawsuit by X Corp, formerly Twitter, against a nonprofit that had published research critical of the social media platform, saying there could be “no mistaking” that the suit was about “punishing” the firm’s critics.

X sued the Center for Countering Digital Hate in July in the US District Court for the Northern District of California after the CCDH published several reports it said showed a rise in hate speech on the platform following its takeover by entrepreneur Elon Musk in October 2022.

X said the organisation harmed its business by scaring away advertisers and had cost it tens of millions of dollars.

“Sometimes it is unclear what is driving a litigation, and only by reading between the lines of a complaint can one attempt to surmise a plaintiff’s true purpose,” wrote Judge Charles R. Breyer in a ruling on Monday.

“Other times, a complaint is so unabashedly and vociferously about one thing that there can be no mistaking that purpose. This case is about punishing the Defendants for their speech.”

Image credit: SpaceX

‘Punishing’ criticism

He added that the case also appeared to be intended to dissuade other critical publications.

Recent research found that more than 100 projects studying X had been cancelled, suspended or changed due to Musk’s actions, including fears of lawsuits following the CCDH case.

X said it plans to appeal.

The ruling is a setback for Musk, currently the world’s second-richest person according to Forbes, who has used legal threats to stem criticism of his actions with the social media platform.

Those threats included a November lawsuit against Media Matters for America after it published a report showing ads appearing on X alongside neo-Nazi posts.

‘Right to research’

CCDH chief executive Imran Ahmed said the ruing had affirmed “our fundamental right to research, to speak, to advocate, and to hold accountable social media companies for decisions they make behind closed doors”.

X is also suing a law firm that represented it before Musk’s ownership, alleging it collected unreasonabily high fees, and is being sued by former Twitter executives who say Musk withheld severance and vendors and landlords who claim they have not been paid, amongst other cases.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Apple Slashes iPhone Prices In China

Amid intense competition from Huawei and others, Apple has again slashed the price of its…

15 hours ago

Bitcoin ‘Creator’ Craig Wright Repeatedly Lied, Rules UK Judge

Damning ruling by British judge, after he rules that self-proclaimed bitcoin inventor lied 'repeatedly' to…

15 hours ago

Julian Assange Granted Right To Challenge US Extradiction Order

High Court rules Wikileaks founder Julian Assange can appeal against extradition to the US, despite…

17 hours ago

Tesla Layoffs Continue With Another 600 Jobs In California

Regulatory filing last week shows Elon Musk's Tesla is cutting another 600 jobs in California,…

18 hours ago

UK Regulator Declines To Investigate Microsoft’s Mistral AI Deal

Weeks after seeking feedback on Microsoft's partnership with Mistral AI, UK regulator says it does…

21 hours ago

UK AI Safety Institute To Open Office In US

Seeking collaboration on AI regulation, UK's AI Safety Institute to cross Atlantic and will open…

22 hours ago