Charities Criticise Move To Shut Down AmazonSmile

Charities have criticised Amazon for ending its AmazonSmile donations programme, saying it was wrong for the company to question the impact the funds were making.

Amazon said last week it would end the programme by 20 February as it had “not grown to create the impact” the e-commerce giant had envisioned at its launch in 2013.

“With so many eligible organisations – more than 1 million globally – our ability to have an impact was often spread too thin,” Amazon said in a statement.

The move comes at a time when Amazon is laying off about 18,000 employees, mostly in divisions such as retail and human resources, following a sharp increase in hiring during the pandemic.

Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy. Image credit: Amazon

Cost-cutting

Other large tech firms, including Microsoft, Facebook parent Meta and Salesforce, have also announced significant job cuts.

But Amazon said only that it wanted to refocus on larger-scale programmes, such as its donations to affordable housing, supporting disaster responses or distributing food aid.

The firm said it would “pursue and invest in other areas where we’ve seen we can make meaningful change”.

AmazonSmile allowed customers to donate a small proportion of all their purchases to a charity of their choice.

Small scale

Amazon said the average donation to UK charities last year was less than £137.

It said it would donate an amount to participating organisations equivalent to six months of what they earned from the programme last year.

But charities said Amazon was wrong to question the benefit that even small donations could make.

New York-based SquirrelWood Equine Sanctuary said the donations had “made a huge difference”.

“Amazon claims the Amazon Smile program didn’t have an impact,” the charity said.

‘Crazy’

“I can tell you as an animal not for profit it made a huge difference to us. That $9400 meant the world.”

Hope Rescue, which benefits stray and abandoned dogs in South Wales, said the programme had been “brilliant”, raising about £6,000 a year toward the company’s running costs.

Vanessa Martin, founder of the Childhood Tumour Trust, told the BBC Amazon’s assessment of the programme made no sense.

“When we are happy with a £10 donation, are they saying it’s better to not give anything?” she said. “Their attitude is crazy.”

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

OpenAI Hit By Austrian Complaint Over ChatGPT ‘False Data’

Rights group argues ChatGPT tendency to generate false information on individuals violates GDPR data protection…

17 hours ago

EU Designates Apple’s iPad OS As DMA ‘Gatekeeper’

European Commission says Apple's iPadOS is 'gatekeeper' due to large number of businesses 'locked in'…

17 hours ago

Beating the Barbarians in the Cloud

As the cloud continues to be an essential asset for all businesses, developing and maintaining…

17 hours ago

Austria Conference Calls For Controls On ‘Killer Robots’

Internatinal conference in Vienna calls for controls on AI-powered autonomous weapons to ensure humans remain…

18 hours ago

Taiwanese Chip Giant Exits China Mainland

Major Taiwan chip assembly and test firm KYEC to sell Jiangsu subsidiary, exit mainland China…

19 hours ago

Deepfakes: More Than Skin Deep Security

As deepfake technology continues to blur the lines between reality and deception, businesses and individuals…

19 hours ago