Human-Like AI ‘May Face Ban’, Says Government Adviser

Powerful general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems may need to be banned, a government advisor has said.

Marc Warner, chief executive of Faculty AI and member of the government’s AI Council advisory committee, said artificial general intelligence (AGI) systems – intended to have intelligence similar to that of a human – are of real concern.

He told the BBC that “sensible decisions” on the technology would be required in the next six months to a year.

It requires strong transparency and audit requirements and more built-in safety mechanisms, he said.


Warner said humanity is in a position of primacy on this planet primarily because of its intelligence.

“If we create objects that are as smart or smarter than us, there is nobody in the world that can give a good scientific justification of why that should be safe,” he said.

He said the technology isn’t necessarily “terrible” but “there is risk” requiring “caution”.

Warner suggested “at the very least” there should be “strong limits” on the amount of computing power that can be devoted to systems that are designed to compete with human at a wide range of tasks.

Regulatory limits

“There is a strong argument that at some point, we may decide that enough is enough and we’re just going to ban algorithms above a certain complexity or a certain amount of compute,” he added.

“But obviously, that is a decision that needs to be taken by governments and not by technology companies”.

General-purpose AI systems are less widely discussed than those with a particular function, such as translating text or searching for cancers in medical images, Warner acknowledged.

But he said AGI is more worrying and will require a new legal framework.

‘Extinction’ risk

Warner added his name to a statement released last week that warns AI poses a “risk of extinction” to humans.

Faculty AI was one of the companies whose representatives met with technology minister Chloe Smith at Downing Street on Thursday to discuss the risks, opportunities and rules needed to ensure safe and responsible AI.

The US and the EU have said they are pushing for a voluntary code of practice for AI companies in the near term, as the EU prepares a legal framework for the technology that is likely to take years to come into effect.

The UK government was criticised for failing to envisage any dedicated regulation for AI in a white paper on the technology published in March.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

MWC 2024: BT To Switch On Stand-alone 5G Network In 2024

Stand-alone 5G network in the UK, without a 4G core or anchor, will be switched…

18 hours ago

Judge Signals Elon Musk May Lose Lawsuit Against Non-profit

Elon Musk's high profile lawsuit against a hate speech non-profit may be in trouble, after…

21 hours ago

OpenAI Sued For Unauthorised Use Of Journalist Content, Again

Three US online news outlets sue OpenAI, alleging the AI pioneer used thousands of their…

2 days ago

Microsoft Investment In Mistral AI Prompts EU Scrutiny Calls

European lawmakers call for investigation after Microsoft this week made small investment in French startup…

2 days ago

Apple To Disclose AI Plans This Year, Says Tim Cook

CEO Tim Cook once again indicates Apple will open up about its generative artificial intelligence…

2 days ago