Apple Suffers ‘Pinch-to-Zoom’ Patent Setback

Editor of eWEEK and repository of knowledge on storage, amongst other things

Follow on: Google +

Apple has suffered a noteworthy setback after the US Patent Office invalidated its “pinch-to-zoom” patent

Apple has suffered what could be a significant intellectual property setback, after the US Patent and Trademark Office invalidated the device maker’s treasured “pinch-to-zoom” patent.

The technology enables users of Apple smartphones and tablets to enlarge an image by touching two fingers on the screen and spreading them slightly apart.

Important Patent?

Apple had used that patent as a key example of the proprietary IT it is trying to protect in its current case against Samsung, which also has a “pinch-to-zoom” feature in its Android mobile devices.

Samsung filed a document in federal court in San Jose, Calif., 19 December indicating that the US Patent Office has declared invalid the entirety of Apple’s patent.

The Samsung document lists portions of the patent that were struck down on re-examination on the basis that prior patents covered the same inventions.

Prior Art

The patent office said that for the Apple’s claims to be valid, they must be considered patentable despite any “prior art patent and printed publication cited.” In a detailed report, the agency said they did not.

This puts a rather large kink into Apple’s copyright case against Samsung. Back on 24 August, a federal court jury in San Jose, California – also presided over by current case Judge Lucy Koh – decided to punish South Korea-based Samsung with a $1.05 billion (£646m) damages fine for ostensibly copying six of Apple’s patents – including the “pinch-to-zoom” patent.

The court proceedings continue to drag on, much to the dismay of Judge Koh and a number of court witnesses and reporters, who’d like to see this litigation buttoned up and put away before the holidays.

To the surprise of no one following the case, Samsung said the development supports its request for a new trial.

Spokespeople for both companies declined to comment beyond the filing on 19 December.

Are you a smartphone expert? Try our iPhone rivals quiz!