Tory MP Davis Slates Plans To Put NHS Data On Google

Conservative plans to put NHS data on Google are “mad” according to David Davis, a leading Conservative MP and former shadow home secretary, who resigned and was re-elected last year over civil liberties issues.

“Google is the last company I would trust with data belonging to me,” said Davis in The Times. The company is “hostile to privacy,” he said quoting watchdog Privacy International which said Google was leading a “race to the bottom” in protection for users among Internet firms.

The NHS’s £20 billion central database could be made unnecessary, if users were given the option of storing their records in Google health, according to a paper from the Conservative think tank, the Centre for Policy Studies, published in June.

“The policy described was so naive I could only hope that it was an unapproved kite-flying exercise by a young researcher in Conservative HQ,” said Davis. The report’s author Liam Maxwell, a Conservative councillor at the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, has backed off from the idea, saying that media stories overstated the idea expressed in his paper.

Davis has a good go at Google, after acknowledging that its monopoly “arises properly from the fact that Google provides a service people want”, and its market capitalisation of $ 130 billion (£79 billion) “represents the value of exploiting its customers’ private data for commercial ends.”

Google is misusing its position, he says, with an “amoral” deal with China, a “high- handed approach to the intrusion on people’s privacy with Streetview,” and a “cavalier approach to European legislation (which it claims does not apply to it)”.

There are good reasons for using private companies to hold NHS data, said Davis, adding another angle to the debate about cloud versus in-house security. Commercial companies, under threat of class-action lawsuits, will try harder to keep data private than public servants who may get a slapped wrist for losing large numbers of records .

“Commercial companies are not perfect, but they have a greater incentive to protect your data,” said Davis.

However, Conservative hopes of putting data on Google for free are demonstrably stupid, because Google’s free services make money through other means: “It should not be possible to make money out of holding health data,” said Davis. “Health information has to be secure, and should not be available to be used for commercial purposes. That means it should not be sold on, it should not be data mined for commercial insights, and it should not be used for targeted advertising.”

Google has not yet replied to our request for a comment.

Peter Judge

Peter Judge has been involved with tech B2B publishing in the UK for many years, working at Ziff-Davis, ZDNet, IDG and Reed. His main interests are networking security, mobility and cloud

Recent Posts

Russia Accused Of Cyberattack On Germany’s Ruling Party, Defence Firms

German foreign minister warns Russia will face consequences for “absolutely intolerable” cyberattack on ruling party,…

20 hours ago

Alphabet Axes Hundreds Of Staff From ‘Core’ Organisation

Google is reportedly laying off at least 200 staff from its “Core” organisation, including key…

21 hours ago

Apple Announces Record Share Buyback, Amid iPhone Sales Decline

Investor appeasement? Apple unveils huge $110 billion share buyback program, as sales of iPhone decline…

1 day ago

Tesla Backs Away From Gigacasting Manufacturing – Report

Tesla retreats from pioneering gigacasting manufacturing process, amid cost cutting and challenges at EV giant

2 days ago

US Urges No AI Control Of Nuclear Weapons

No skynet please. After the US, UK and France pledge human only control of nuclear…

2 days ago