VMware is still king of server virtualisation, but as the use of the technology in data centres grows, so will the use of use virtualisation products from Microsoft, Citrix Systems and Red Hat.
That is what market research firm TheInfoPro found in a study released on 7 December.
VMware continues to lead all other vendors in the virtualisation technology that IT professionals not only use now, but plan to use in the future, Bob Gill, manager director of server research for TheInfoPro, said in an interview. However, a growing number of people say they also have tested an alternative to VMware, with some of those saying they plan on deploying those alternatives.
“Some people are basically saying, ‘I’ve invested in VMware, but I’m not so far down the path where if someone came to me with something more interesting, we would go with it,’” Gill said.
The results of the survey are an indication that even as vendors preach greater homogeneity in the data centre—such as VMware’s virtualisation platform and Cisco Systems’ all-in-one Unified Computing System—users are still looking to use whatever technology makes sense at the time, he said.
VMware offers top-flight virtualisation technology, Gill said, but “the whole beauty of VMware’s offering is that it’s a homogeneous sort of thing.” To get the full benefit requires using the full platform.
What the users are saying is that while they might use VMware for their most important applications in production environments, they are willing to consider going with Microsoft’s Hyper-V or Citrix’s virtualisation products for other workloads and in test and development settings.
Making Hyper-V even more attractive is that it comes as a free feature in Windows Server 2008 R2, which is the focus of the server refresh currently underway. Red Hat’s virtualisation also is inherent in its Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4, he said.
Price does appear to be a consideration. “People are asking themselves, ‘Do I really need a Porsche when a Toyota would be good enough?’” Gill said.
The x86 virtualisation field is a wide open one, Gill said. Most businesses that use virtualisation are running it on 10 to 15 percent of their servers, he said. That will grow as businesses continue to look to save money in part through consolidating workloads on fewer servers.
“An awful lot of folks are still at a very primitive level” of virtualisation use, Gill said. Microsoft, Citrix and Red Hat can take advantage of those numbers to gain greater traction in the space.
To be sure, IT professionals who are using VMware are happy with the products, he said. There are few complaints, and little desire to reduce or eliminate their use of VMware technology. It’s just that users also are willing to entertain alternatives.
The numbers bear that out. Just over 75 percent of those surveyed said they currently are using VMware, but almost two-thirds said they have tested a hypervisor other than VMware—Microsoft and Citrix being the vendors most cited. Of those two-thirds, 27 percent said they plan to use the alternative product, while another 20 percent said they may use it.
Only 2 percent of VMware customers said they had firm plans to switch to an alternative, while 9 percent were considering it.
VMware users on a whole aren’t switching away from those products, but many seem interested in creating a heterogeneous environment.
Microsoft faces formal EU antitrust charges over videoconferencing app Teams after concessions to European Commission…
Workers at New Jersey Apple Store vote against joining union as post-pandemic labour drive at…
Microsoft-backed OpenAI releases new AI model GPT-4o with voice conversation capability, desktop app and updated…
SpaceX prepares fourth Starship test flight, launches more Starlink satellites, shows EVA suit for commercial…
SpaceX and its contractors have left construction bills unpaid in Texas, angering many smaller suppliers,…
US to triple domestic chipmaking capacity and control 30 percent of advanced chips by 2032…
View Comments
"If someone came along with something more compelling we'd consider deploying it".
The reason VMware is still "the king of server virtualization", is because it's technology is 5-6 years ahead of the pack. It's far more compelling to deploy things that work, rather than "look at me" technologies by upstarts and catch-ups.
This "study", just sounds like fear/uncertainty/doubt from the redmond press corps.
If we can't build something 10% as good as VMware, let's make it sound like we're nipping at their heels with our crap substitute (that NO ONE that wants to keep their job would seriously even play with, let alone deploy in a production environment).
Another page from the Microsoft playbook. Here's an idea: make something as good if not better than VMware's stuff, instead of releasing fluff in the media like this. Your products still stink, relatively speaking.
There is nothing 'compelling' that I've ever seen about Hyper-V, except that it's tied to the OS, doesn't migrate VMs worth a damn, is nearly impossible to configure, has no fault-tolerance, hidden licensing costs that make it MORE expensive TCO than VMware, has no deployment tools, an unwieldy management interface, it is for the most part COMPLETELY UNUSABLE.
And this is some sort of immediate threat to VMware?
Explain to me how that is true again?
Use an actual study with facts this time.