Two of the UK’s largest internet service providers (ISPs) have lost their appeal against the controversial anti-piracy measures in the Digital Economy Act (DEA).
The court of appeal ruled that BT and TalkTalk must comply with the Act, meaning that identified file-sharers may soon receive warning letters and could eventually be forced offline.
Lord Justice Arden, Lord Justice Patten and Lord Justice Richards today dismissed BT and TalkTalk’s claims, saying that the DEA is proportionate in dealing with illegal file-sharing and the costs incurred are justified.
The ISPs will be made to pay 25 per cent of the costs required to set up an appeals body for alleged pirates and 25 per cent of the fees associated in finding them, according to the Guardian. The court did however decide that the ISPs would not have to pay 25 per cent of case fees.
“We’re disappointed that our appeal was unsuccessful though we welcome the additional legal clarity that has been provided for all parties,” said TalkTalk in a statement. “Though we have lost this appeal, we will continue fighting to defend our customers’ rights against this ill-judged legislation.”
Copyright groups claim that piracy currently costs them £400 million per year. Various creative unions and organisations welcomed today’s ruling as a way to prevent ongoing damage to their industry.
“Once again the court is on the side of the almost two million workers in the creative industries whose livelihoods are put at risk because creative content is stolen on a daily basis,” said Equity general secretary, Christine Payne, speaking to the BBC.
However, resistance against the DEA will likely not subside, particularly considering persistent opposition from the UK’s Pirate Party and past challenges from the Liberal Democrats.
“When the Digital Economy Act itself was passed in the dying stages of the Labour government, there was a huge amount of disquiet that this kind of important legislation was being introduced without proper scrutiny,” Adam Rendle, a copyright specialist at law firm Taylor Wessing, told the BBC.
“That kind of disquiet didn’t result in the kind of action we’ve seen against Acta and SOPA. It wouldn’t be surprising to see a lot more public outcry than there was when the Act was first passed.”
Tesla retreats from pioneering gigacasting manufacturing process, amid cost cutting and challenges at EV giant
No skynet please. After the US, UK and France pledge human only control of nuclear…
Microsoft's AI investments continue in south east Asia, after investments in Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia, as…
New chapter for LastPass as it becomes an independent company to focus on cybersecurity, after…
US FCC seeks to ban Chinese telecom firms at centre of national security concerns from…
Two updates to Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude sees arrival of a new business-focused plan, as…
View Comments
The legislation was rushed/forced through at a time when the public focus was elsewhere - another Mandelson action.
The most intriguing part of this is going to be how legal filesharing and downloads will be differentiated from illegal sharing. How will this work? Will every file shared be scrutinised? At what depth? Will they be able to identify near-identical files with different names?
Can of worms...
It is about time the decades-old copyright 'industry' brought itself up to date.