Even as some developers continue to create apps for the iPhone, others are gearing up an increase in customer demand for Google’s Android applications.
At a meeting of the New York Linux Users Group (NYLUG) here, Nathan Freitas, a partner with Oliver Coady, a New York-based consulting and application development firm specialising in mobile development, said he expects the advent of paid-for applications for the Google Android to boost both quality and quantity of Android applications.
“I think that ‘for-pay’ applications will certainly help to increase Android development,” Freitas said. “Right now I’m throwing in Android ports for applications I write for the iPhone, because I do iPhone development, too,” Freitas told a crowded room of current and prospective Android developers at the 18th Feb NYLUG meeting. “I think the market is becoming more forward-looking and there is a good amount of interest in Android apps. The iPhone is wildly successful, but Android is catching on.”
Indeed, Brian Gupta, a developer with the system administration support firm, Brandorr, said that within 12 months or so, “I think Android is going to be wildly successful” and will cut into Windows Mobile’s market share and will provide realistic competition for the iPhone. Gupta said he expects that the prospective adoption of Android by Sprint also will boost the platform.
Meanwhile, Freitas, who has worked at Palm as a program manager building Java code, said he appreciates Android as “the first open mobile platform. There’s really a lot to hack on. It’s really the first open platform developer-tools-wise. No one’s ever put the effort into delivering a fully cross-platform development environment.”
Moreover, Android features a “great SDK [Software Development Kit]” in Android 1.1 SDK Release 1, with or without the Eclipse IDE support, he said. Freitas said he likes having the ability to either hack code by hand or to use the Eclipse IDE, particularly for debugging code written in different languages. Freitas then discussed various favoured features, including the Android Emulator, which is a virtual mobile device that runs on a developer’s PC.
Making a comparison to the iPhone development environment, Freitas said, “There’s a big difference between APIs and a thoughtful platform…The iPhone is a beautiful device and a great user experience.”
However, the iPhone world does not focus as much on providing an ecosystem of services for developers like Android does, Freitas said, noting the OpenIntents.org site, which is a place to collect, design and implement open intents and interfaces to make Android mobile applications work more closely together. In addition, Freitas mentioned the PhoneGap project, which is a development tool that allows Web developers to take advantage of the core features in the iPhone, Android, and BlackBerry SDK using JavaScript.
Meanwhile, some members of the group began discussing various hacks to the Android, including how to gain root of the system and to add things to it that were not intended by the Google developers, such as the Debian Linux system. The Android phone was not designed to install Debian or use custom firmware, but various members of the development community have devised ways to do both. By getting root of the system, developers can update bootloads and install custom firmware. However, to get root, developers need to be running Android OS RC29 or lower, which is available in some circle, some said.
Page: 1 2
Microsoft's AI investments continue in south east Asia, after investments in Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia, as…
New chapter for LastPass as it becomes an independent company to focus on cybersecurity, after…
US FCC seeks to ban Chinese telecom firms at centre of national security concerns from…
Two updates to Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude sees arrival of a new business-focused plan, as…
Most people in the United States view TikTok as a Chinese influence tool a poll…
UK regulator confirms it is investigating whether OnlyFans is doing enough to prevent children accessing…
View Comments
I hope smartphone OSes eventually evolve to a concept where there is a common Linux platform with different installable "desktops" (e.g. Android/webOS/Symbian/Blackberry/etc.)...kinda like KDE & GNOME. This would be beneficial because:
1. device vendors would be able to differentiate their devices with a unique user experience.
2. component/chip vendors would have fewer drivers to develop & support.
3. consumers would theoretically be able to change "desktops", without changing devices.
4. the linux platform would be community developed & supported (versus being re-invented for every smartphone OS).
5. the linux platform would be portable to different CPU architectures (e.g. ARM & x86).