Google wants as many people as possible to use its web services. These services would get more search traffic and therefore expose more users to its ads if the services were ranked higher in results.
This is a big no-no in the SEO (search engine optimisation) community, which, ironically enough, tries to game Google for better placement. Foundem and others are, in effect, accusing Google of gaming Google to boost Google’s bottom line.
That is the sort of fodder antitrust experts such as Gary Reback, who took down the mighty Microsoft last decade, and regulators such as the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission, are dying to use as firepower in building a case against Google.
Reback is rumored to have toured Capitol Hill with Foundem’s founders to teach politicians about Google’s evil ways. That’s ominous if true.
We already know Microsoft is lurking here in the background after it admitted telling the DOJ how Google is unfairly abusing the search market.
If the DOJ, FTC or God knows what regulator asks for a tour of Google’s algorithmic software, they would have major Google rival Microsoft there to consult and find any wrongdoing.
The regulators would talk all they want about using third parties to determine any foul play in Google’s search, but if I’m the DOJ or FTC I want search experts in the market to diagnose any damaging works. Who’s handy? Microsoft’s Bing team.
If Google is screwing over rivals in the market with its search engine, than the next point is moot. But if it has done nothing legally wrong, letting anyone see it’s search tweaks and how they are done could cause irreparable damage to the search engine Google has striven so hard to protect in the last 11 years.
Microsoft would get access to Google’s crown jewels, which would be a major competitive boost for the company as it tries to ascend to capture Google’s search crown. That’s the main reason I’d be scared to let the government see my inner works if I’m Google.
I just have this sinking feeling the government is actively and quietly working with Microsoft to build a case against Google, using Microsoft’s own expertise in search. The DOJ and FTC could leverage Microsoft’s market knowledge base to build its case.
I don’t trust the government regarding Google. Regulators have sought to thwart Google’s web advances (to keep Google from becoming the Microsoft of the Internet, no less) in book search and mobile advertising. The FTC’s embarrassing failure to stymie Google’s bid for AdMob is a classic example.
Here’s the thing, though: The government has all the clout in the law on its side. When leaders of industry get together to do something big, it sometimes leads to collusion.
If the government gets together with Reback, Foundem and Microsoft and sniffs out improprieties at Google, it will be viewed as justice served.
Sorry, that’s a witch hunt to me. All the more reason for Google to keep the government from seeing its crown jewels, despite the Times‘ naive suggestion.
But, again, if it’s proven Google is doing some sneaky things with its algorithm to boost its other services, then the point is moot. They will get raked over the coals around the world. Deservedly so.
Page: 1 2
Anthem used by protesters in Hong Kong is blocked by YouTube, as critics lash out…
'Unexpected behaviour' of Waymo's self-driving vehicles triggers investigation by American safety regulators
Group of TikTok creators in the United States attempt to block recent law that will…
Hundreds of climate activists clashed with police outside Tesla gigafactory near Berlin, in protest over…
AI very much the focus at Google's annual developer conference, including Google Gemini and a…
Co-founder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever to leave OpenAI, after role in Sam Altman's firing…
View Comments
Did the writer actually read the NYT column? It says that it'd be good if Google revealed the editorial guidelines that guide its changes to the search engine, not reveal the algorithm. The story actually advises the opposite of what this writer is ranting against:
"Google provides an incredibly valuable service, and the government must be careful not to stifle its ability to innovate. Forcing it to publish the algorithm or the method it uses to evaluate it would allow every Web site to game the rules in order to climb up the rankings — destroying its value as a search engine. Requiring each algorithm tweak to be approved by regulators could drastically slow down its improvements. "