Apple has been granted another preliminary injunction banning the sales of a Samsung device in the United States, this time concerning the Samsung Galaxy Nexus.
The iPhone-manufacturer was able to convince The United States District Court for the Northern District of California that the Galaxy Nexus likely infringed all four of the patents it asserted and that all four are likely valid.
However an injunction was only granted because it was able to prove to District Judge Lucy Koh that monetary damages were insufficient to repair the “irreparable” damages caused by Samsung’s infringement of a Siri patent.
“The Court finds that the full extent of these losses would likely be unascertainable, difficult to calculate, and irreparable,” said the court. “Apple has adequately established the requisite causal nexus between Samsung’s alleged infringement of the ‘604 Patent and Apple’s risk of suffering irreparable harm.”
To enforce the injunction, Apple has had to post a bond of $96 million, exactly the amount that Samsung has demanded, however the Korean manufacturer has appealed the decision. It has filed a motion with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to stay the injunction for the entire of the duration of the appeal.
Analyst Florian Mueller has suggested that Apple could not turn its attention towards the Samsung Galaxy S III, possibly with regards to the same Siri patent.
“If Apple moved for a preliminary injunction against the S III now over the Siri patent, it would be very likely to win, but it would have to accept a postponement of the trial of its first lawsuit against Samsung,” he said. “This is a tough choice to make, but a motion over only one patent wouldn’t necessarily cause a huge delay.”
The decision is the latest leg of a legal battle that has seen the two companies fight in courts around the world. Last week, the same court banned sales of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the US while it decides on the dispute between the two companies, while a Dutch court has ordered Apple to pay damages to Samsung for infringing its patents.
What do you know about patents? Find out with our quiz!
New UK rules bring in basic security requirements for millions of internet-connected devices, aiming to…
Google parent Alphabet sees market capitalisation surge over $2tn on plan to over first-ever cash…
Google asks Virginia federal court to dismiss case brought by US Justice Department and eight…
Snapchat parent Snap reports user growth, revenues in spite of tough competition, in what may…
Quick-growing fast-fashion company Shein must comply with most stringent level of EU digital rules after…
Intel shares sag after company shares gloomy revenue predictions, as data centre chip demand hit…
View Comments
This rather silly continued abuse of IP law amongst those enormous tech firms that can clearly afford to pitch their commercial battles in courtrooms rather than the retail marketplace, really has got quite out of hand.
What is unique about Siri? - Nothing its just an application seen in many scifi movies and uses well known techniques which have been around for some time. Just shows how wrong the patent system is - especially software ones.
As for 'slide-to-unlock' what idiot gave a patent on that! Guess Apple now have a patent over my front door catch.