UK Police Clueless On DNA Databases

Police forces across the UK have no idea whether the DNA data they are storing relates to innocent or guilty people, indicating the government is going to have a tough time following through on pledges to reform the system, a report has found.

Big Brother Watch (BBW) found just three police forces (North Wales, Staffordshire and West Mercia Police) could distinguish DNA profiles of those convicted from those who had never even been charged.

The government has introduced the Protection of Freedoms Act, which requires a DNA database entry to be deleted three years after a person has been arrested, unless a Chief Constable deems the retention to be in the interests of ‘national security’ or there is another criteria set out by the Home Secretary.

Opportunity for review

As an example of how police forces are not removing entries, Suffolk Constabulary was found to have collected 17,465 samples and deleted only four between January 2009 and November 2011.

At least 900,000 samples of DNA  were gathered by police forces over that time, with London’s Metropolitan Police Service raking in 120,000.

The data emerged following an Freedom of Information (FoI) request from BBW.

“It should not be for the police to have the final say if someone’s DNA will be retained,” argued Nick Pickles, director of BBW.

“This should be taken as an opportunity to fundamentally review the entire system before the number of innocent people caught up in it grows even larger.

“It is deeply troubling that very soon English and Welsh citizens could find that their details are retained and shared in situations where someone from Scotland or another country would not have to worry about something that happened many years in the past.”

Police hold large banks of sensitive data. Last year, the Police National Database was launched,  allowing forces to share and access locally held intelligence.

The police came under fire from the Public Accounts Committee last week, after a project to equip officers with BlackBerrys failed to provide anything close to the anticipated savings. Where £125 million in cashable savings was supposed to have been achieved, it has so far only managed £600,000.

Are you a privacy boff? Try our quiz!

Thomas Brewster

Tom Brewster is TechWeek Europe's Security Correspondent. He has also been named BT Information Security Journalist of the Year in 2012 and 2013.

Recent Posts

Italy, White House Condemn ‘Discriminatory’ Tech Taxes

Italy, White House issue joint statement condemning 'discriminatory' tech taxes as US seeks to end…

5 hours ago

Italian Newspaper Hails ‘Success’ With AI-Generated Supplement

Italian newspaper Il Foglio says four-page AI-generated supplement published every day for a month shows…

5 hours ago

Huawei Updates Smart Glasses With Live Translation

Huawei launches Titanium edition of Eyewear 2 smart glasses with gesture controls and AI-powered simultaneous…

6 hours ago

Head Of Chinese Chip Tools Company Drops US Citizenship

Gerald Yin, founder, chairman and chief executive of key Chinese chip tools maker AMEC, drops…

6 hours ago

Intel Tells Chinese Clients Some AI Chips To Require Licence

Intel reportedly tells clients in China some of its AI chips will now require export…

7 hours ago

Intel Chief Flattens Leadership Structure

New Intel chief executive Lip-Bu Tan flattens company's leadership structure as he seeks to end…

7 hours ago