South Korea Bans Devices From Both Apple And Samsung

On Friday, the Seoul Central District Court ruled that Apple and Samsung have both infringed on each other’s patents. In an unusual turn of events, it fined both companies and banned sales of fourteen products, including Samsung’s Galaxy S II and Galaxy Tab, and Apple’s iPhone 4 and iPad 2.

This ruling – which covers older products from both companies, rather than their latest devices, comes just days before a jury decides the outcome of a $2.5 billion (£1.58b) court battle between the same companies in the US.

Everyone’s a loser

In April 2011, Apple sued Samsung in the US, accusing the company of “copying” its designs. Samsung, in turn, sued the iPhone manufacturer in its home country of South Korea, claiming that Apple was using its technology patents without a license.

This became a part of a broader campaign, with Apple and Samsung suing each other in nine different countries, including Germany, Japan, Great Britain and Australia.

“There are lots of external design similarities between the iPhone and Galaxy S, such as rounded corners and large screens … but these similarities had been documented in previous products,” said one of the judges, as reported by Reuters.

The court had decided that the phones looked “different”, and it was unlikely that consumers would confuse the Galaxy with the iPhone. If it wasn’t obvious enough, the huge logos on the back of the devices were a definite giveaway.

However, the situation with the patents was not as clear. The court found that Apple infringed on two of Samsung’s wireless technology patents, while Samsung was copying Apple’s patented bounce-back scrolling feature.

The three-judge panel had ordered companies to pay minor damages, but decided to ban the sales of ten Samsung and four Apple devices, including the iPhone 4. It should be noted that none of the banned products are flagship devices.

According to Chinese news agency Xinhua, Samsung has treated the outcome as a victory. “We welcome today’s ruling, which affirms our position that Apple has been using our mobile telecommunications standards patents without having obtained the necessary licenses. Equally important, today’s ruling also affirmed our position that one single company cannot monopolize generic design features,” the company said in an email statement.

It was also previously reported that Samsung cherishes media exposure which accompanies such high-profile court cases, treating it like a marketing exercise.

The verdict in a similar, but more expensive lawsuit filed in San Jose,California, is expected this weekend. In the US, Apple is demanding more than $2.5 billion in damages to compensate for seven counts of patent infringement, and an order to permanently ban Samsung from selling some of its products. Samsung argues that Apple owes it $422 million (£266m) for violating five patents.

Some experts have suggested that Apple’s litigation might eventually ruin it, drawing parallels with an 80s software powerhouse Ashton-Tate.

How closely have you been following the evolution of the iPhone? Take our quiz!

Max Smolaks

Max 'Beast from the East' Smolaks covers open source, public sector, startups and technology of the future at TechWeekEurope. If you find him looking lost on the streets of London, feed him coffee and sugar.

Recent Posts

Google, DOJ Closing Arguments Clash Over Search ‘Monopoly’

Google clashes with US Justice Department in closing arguments as government argues Google used illegal…

4 hours ago

Stanford AI Scientist Working On ‘Spatial Intelligence’ Start-Up

Prominent Stanford University AI scientist Fei-Fei Li reportedly completes funding round for start-up based on…

4 hours ago

Apple Shares Surge Ahead Of New AI Hardware Launches

Apple shares surge on optimism that new AI-focused hardware launches will drive renewed sales, starting…

5 hours ago

Biden Vetoes Republican Measure In Row Over Contractors’ Unions

Biden vetoes Republican-backed measure amidst dispute over 'joint employer' status for contract workers, affecting tech…

5 hours ago

Lawyers Say Strict Child Controls In China Show TikTok Could Do Better

Lawyers in US social media addiction action say strict controls on Douyin in China show…

6 hours ago

London Black Cabs Sue Uber In Latest Legal Tangle

More than 10,000 London black cab drivers sue Uber claiming company acted illegally to obtain…

6 hours ago