A Dutch court has refused Samsung’s bid to block the sale of Apple’s iPad and iPhone in the country, in what has been described as a victory for “the concept of FRAND standards.”
The court ruled that Samsung could not gain an injunction as Apple appeared willing to negotiate a license agreement on FRAND terms for the use of one of the Korean manufacturer’s 3G patents. However, the door has been left open for Samsung to seek damages over Apple’s use of Intel chips.
Meanwhile, Apple has been granted leave to make a case for patent exhaustion over Intel chips under US law. It must make its case before 28 March and if it does, Samsung will have until 11 April to reply.
“The Dutch court once again found that Samsung sought injunctive relief at a time when, in that court’s opinion, it had yet to comply with its FRAND licensing obligations,” commented analyst Florian Mueller, in a blog post. “So far, Samsung has not been able to prevail with any of its offensive claims against Apple anywhere on this planet. Today’s ruling is only the latest in a series of losses. Samsung succeeded against Apple only defensively by fending off, or winning the reversal of, decisions in Apple’s favour.
“Against that background, Samsung is not presently in a position to force Apple into a settlement on the Korean company’s preferred terms.”
The ruling is the latest development in a worldwide legal battle between the two companies that has seen Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 banned from sale in Germany, yet a Dutch court refused to do the same. Samsung tried to block the sale of the iPhone 4S in France and Italy over a 3G patent but failed.
The company is currently the subject of an EU investigation that is deciding whether Samsung is illegally attempting to hinder its competitors through the use of its patents and Mueller thinks that this case could have implications for it.
“Samsung is going to have to explain this conduct to the European Commission, which is formally investigating Samsung’s use of standard-essential patents against Apple,” he commented.
How closely have you been following the evolution of the iPhone? Find out with our quiz!
Google clashes with US Justice Department in closing arguments as government argues Google used illegal…
Prominent Stanford University AI scientist Fei-Fei Li reportedly completes funding round for start-up based on…
Apple shares surge on optimism that new AI-focused hardware launches will drive renewed sales, starting…
Biden vetoes Republican-backed measure amidst dispute over 'joint employer' status for contract workers, affecting tech…
Lawyers in US social media addiction action say strict controls on Douyin in China show…
More than 10,000 London black cab drivers sue Uber claiming company acted illegally to obtain…
View Comments
Its not just Samsung, but Apple (probably the worst offender) and others who are grossly misusing the patent and design laws.
Time to strike down a lot of patents that are not significant or just logical developments of previous technology.
The Patent systems are no longer fit for purpse!
To be fair to Samsung they are only counter attacking to try and reach a settlement so that they can compete with Apple fairly.
Patent system is broken. It's a shame all this legal money isn't being spent on creating products for users rather than lining the pockets of lawyers.