Top Reasons Why The Conficker Worm May Strike Back

The Conficker worm affected users nearly one year ago. But now that it has left the headlines, there might be a false sense of security in the Windows ecosystem

7. There’s no threat
The average malicious hacker just isn’t worried about the ramifications of releasing another Conficker-like worm. Have we caught the bad guys in the past? Sure. But the vast majority of hackers are free to wreak havoc on Windows computers, never worrying about being caught. Microsoft offered a $250,000 reward to the person who caught the hackers behind Conficker. It has yet to pay out. Until we catch the hackers and bring them to justice, there’s little chance they’ll think twice about exploiting users.

8. Software problems are intensifying
There are more security threats impacting the Windows ecosystem than ever before. But it’s not just Windows that bears the blame. Many of the applications users are running on their computers are also contributing to the issue. Secure software isn’t necessarily finding its way to computers today. That gives malware distributors countless opportunities to find unique ways to impact millions.

9. How have things really changed?
When we consider the Conficker outbreak and the response to it, I’m hard-pressed to find ways in which our ability to confront such a threat has changed. Microsoft and the security community might have been more proactive with Conficker than it was in the past, but nothing groundbreaking has emerged from the incident. It’s difficult to say that we really learned from Conficker and we’ve taken concrete measures to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

10. There’s no shortage of malicious hackers
As much as I’d like to say that the number of people trying to exploit others is small, it’s really not. There are folks all over the world who are constantly trying to find ways to create a Conficker-like outbreak. Many fail. But until we find a way to stay ahead of those people, rather than wait for them to strike, at least some will succeed. And that is simply unacceptable.