Playing hardball. MPs use rare parliamentary powers to seize documents after Zuckerberg refuses to testify
The British Parliament has exacted a measure of revenge against Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg after it seized American court documents.
Earlier this year Zuckerberg had famously declined to appear before the British parliamentary committee investigating questions about privacy and the Cambridge Analytica data sharing scandal.
British MPs were very unhappy that Zuckerberg decided instead to send his chief technical officer, Mike Schroepfer, to appear before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (DCMS). Yet Zuckerberg did choose to appear before the European Parliament as well as US lawmakers.
Indeed the British DCMS committee said in May that the US social network continued to leave “significant gaps” in the answers it had provided to Parliament.
And now it has emerged that the British Parliament used rarely executed powers to force the boss of a US software firm to hand over sensitive court documents.
The Observer first reported the story, which involved the boss of US tech firm Six4Three, whilst he was on a trip to London.
Six4Three is fighting Facebook in a Californian court, where it obtained the documents via US disclosure laws.
It is reported that the cache of documents contains “significant revelations about Facebook decisions on data and privacy controls” that led to the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
This is said to include confidential emails between senior executives, and correspondence with Zuckerberg himself.
The House of Commons serjeant-at-arms reportedly went to the businessman’s hotel, and gave the CEO a final warning and a two-hour deadline to comply with the order.
When the Six4Three CEO failed to hand over the documents he was reportedly “escorted to Parliament” and warned he risked fines and imprisonment if the documents were not surrendered.
“We are in uncharted territory,” said MP Damian Collins. “This is an unprecedented move but it’s an unprecedented situation. We’ve failed to get answers from Facebook and we believe the documents contain information of very high public interest.”
Collins said the reluctance of Zuckerberg to testify, plus misleading testimony from Schroepfer, had forced MPs to explore other options for gathering information about Facebook operations.
Collins also later told the BBC that he believed the documents were “highly relevant” to his inquiry.
But Facebook is unhappy with the move and has demanded the documents return.
“The materials obtained by the DCMS committee are subject to a protective order of the San Mateo Superior Court restricting their disclosure,” Facebook told the Observer.
“We have asked the DCMS committee to refrain from reviewing them and to return them to counsel or to Facebook,” it said.
Collins and his committee had been following this US case, and when the businessman entered British jurisdiction, Parliament moved quickly to secure the documents.
How much do you know about privacy? Try our quiz!