The US’ Federal Trade Commission is reportedly expanding its antitrust probe of Google to include the company’s new “Search, plus your world” social-search feature, an effort to make users’ results more personal.
Bloomberg and Reuters both said on 13 January that the FTC is looking into the matter because it is concerned Google is providing preference to Google+ over web services from others, breaking its promise to provide unbiased search results.
Search, plus your world injects posts and pictures from users’ Google+ accounts into their search results. It also makes users’ Google+ contacts and relevant Google+ Pages more readily searchable.
EPIC on 13 January complained to the FTC that Google is skewering user privacy and antitrust rules just to keep up with Facebook.
The FTC appears to be listening to the Internet’s concerns, which echo complaints brought to bear by senators who complained that Google was ranking its own products higher than those of Yelp, Expedia and others in its search results.
Search Engine Land’s Greg Sterling told eWEEK: “Google’s promotion of Google+, seemingly without giving ‘equal time’ to other networks, plays right into the chief complaint of many of Google’s antitrust critics: that the company favours its own products and properties at the expense of competitors. Google either mishandled the communication around the rollout or demonstrated a kind of strange naïveté about how critics might react.”
Google declined to comment on whether or not the FTC had contacted it about the new social-search issue. However, the company was unapologetic as to how Search, plus your world excludes Facebook, Twitter and other sources in its results.
“The laws are designed to help consumers benefit from innovation, not to help competitors,” a Google spokesperson told eWEEK. “We believe that our improvements to search will benefit consumers by better surfacing social content, and the great thing about the openness of the Internet is that if users don’t like our service, they can easily switch to another site.”
There is some truth to this viewpoint. Casual users of Google+, Facebook and Twitter – that is, the majority of social service users – tend to go to all of those websites separately and don’t expect content from one would necessarily be in the other.
However, the other viewpoint espoused by some search and Internet experts is that the world’s leading search engine must not exclude data sources from its search index.
There is often a gray area between playing fairly and actually violating antitrust laws, which are designed to protect consumers, not necessarily competitors in business.
Some experts said Google’s practice is not necessarily an antitrust matter. Mark A. Lemley, a professor at Stanford Law School who directs the programme in law, science and technology, told The New York Times the move should not be viewed in anticompetitive terms.
“It can’t be the rule that if Facebook says no, you can’t search our links, that Google can’t search its own links. That is not antitrust,” Lemley said.
Still, the FTC can’t ignore this issue, given the media outcry. “Even if the EPIC complaint hadn’t been filed, I would have expected the FTC to examine this,” Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan told eWEEK. “The investigation is still ongoing, so you’d obviously want to include this.”
US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo says Huawei's flagship smartphone chip 'years behind' US technology, shows…
Cloud companies, business user groups say Broadcom price changes do not address their concerns, as…
Dating app Grindr sued over claims it shared sensitive user data, including HIV status, with…
Meta Platforms opens operating system behind Quest virtual reality headsets to third parties amidst competition…
European Commission may ban rewards feature in recently launched TikTok Lite that it calls 'toxic…
US House of Representatives passes new bill combining TikTok measures with foreign aid, may face…
View Comments
Okay, so the big boys and playing tit for tat. Maybe it is just a "Look what you did to me, now look what I'll do to you," game.
Problem is, Google is completely off the rails and blatantly putting its own content above others. If you're a publisher, this *should* concern you, because the dominating content is often thin, and of poor quality. The very thing Panda was supposedly destroying small web businesses for in 2011.
Whatever the reason, Google is violating its own rules, it is favoring its own content and forcing people to join its social network.
Google is a search engine.
While it's a great search engine, it's a monopoly. And in the past year or so has begun to create lots of unhappy users. (Don't forget publishers are users, too. Otherwise, Google does't provide Analytics, its blogging platform, and the many other free tools for searchers. They were goodies and freebies doled out over the years to win trust, loyalty, fame and favor.)
But it is becoming clear that it isn't happy with just being a search engine that buys into vastly unrelated sectors of the economy, offers a free service to replace it, then subsequently destroys that sector and most of the jobs attached. (Witness the New York Times.)
Google has an appetite for power. It's game has gone way beyond money now and it stops at nothing to get what it wants. Antitrust allegations are met with "it's-not-what-you-think" reponses.
But this is so obvious. True colors are shining.
Those in disbelief need to wake up and write their Congressman, demanding a full, aggressive investigation into what Google is *really* doing. There's way too much smoke here, for there to be no fire.