MPs Face Legal Challenge Over Disappearing Messages

MPs could be restricted from using self-destructing messages on platforms such as WhatsApp and Signal, under a legal challenge mounted by transparency campaigners.

The WhatsApp and Signal messaging apps are used by both Cabinet and Shadow Cabinet ministers.

Both platforms offer an option that automatically deletes a message from both the sender’s and the recipient’s devices after a period of time, with WhatsApp launching its version of the feature last November.

But campaigners fear lawmakers and advisers could use such features to avoid accountability.

Transparency

There are also concerns that disappearing messages could create a “black hole” in British history.

The government said “appropriate arrangements” are in place to ensure records are kept.

“It’s not appropriate to conduct government business on disappearing-message platforms,” said Cori Crider, a director of campaigning law group Foxglove.

“The basic point is that privacy is for the citizen and transparency is for the government. This government is amassing more and more data on all of us and we have less and less information on them. That has the democratic bargain exactly backwards.”

Foxglove is bringing the legal action on behalf of non-profit political campaign group the Citizens.

The firm has sent a letter to government on the issue, and said that if a satisfactory response is not received within 14 days it may proceed to a judicial review.

‘Black hole’

The Information Commissioner’s Office has previously declared that private messaging services, such as emails and text messages, are subject to freedom of information requests.

And official guidance says a record needs to be retained if it relates to “substantive discussions or decisions”, such as messages between advisors and ministers over government policy.

But the increasingly routine use of “disappearing” messages threatens to leave a “black hole” in British history, the Citizens said.

“We are in an unprecedented national emergency and we are going to have no records of how decisions were made or even who made them,” the group said in a statement.

It added that tech platforms are enabling a government “cloak of secrecy”.

The Cabinet Office said “appropriate arrangements” are in place to ensure records of official communications are retained and these are under “periodic review”.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Meta Building Fastest AI Supercomputer In The World

Facebook building the world’s fastest AI supercomputer to help detect and moderate offensive posts and…

2 hours ago

Nvidia Preparing To Abandon $40bn ARM Acquisition – Report

Facing many regulatory probes and lawsuits, Nvidia tells its partners it is preparing to abandon…

3 hours ago

Vodafone To Switch Off 3G Network Next Year

Mobile operators press ahead with early retirement of old networks, as Vodafone sets 2023 deadline…

5 hours ago

Online Safety Bill Is A ‘Missed Opportunity,’ MPs Warn

DCMS committee says draft version of landmark online safety bill is not robust or clear…

7 hours ago

Julian Assange Wins Right To Ask Supreme Court For Extradition Appeal

Another twist. Julian Assange wins right to ask UK's Supreme Court if it will hear…

7 hours ago

ICO Disagrees With Government-Backed Encryption Campaign

UK data protection watchdog, the ICO, says encryption provides protections for children, after government-backed campaign…

8 hours ago