Samsung has requested that the iPad Mini, iPad 4 and fifth-generation iPod Touch be added to its upcoming patent lawsuit against Apple.
The two parties are due to go to trial in March 2014, meaning that additional products can be added until closer the time. Last week, the same court ruled that the iPhone 5 could be included in the litigation.
Samsung said it believes the recently announced iDevices infringe the same patents that it alleges other Apple products violate, but they were not yet available when Samsung brought its previous motion.
Judge Paul Grewal has previously indicated that the motion to include the iPads will most likely be accepted after he warned Apple not to oppose the inclusion of new products. However, analyst Florian Mueller has suggested the court’s permissive attitude might even favour Apple as it will allow it to bring more amendments.
“Samsung has a broader range of product offerings,” said Mueller. “Also, Android update cycles are shorter than Apple’s.”
But Mueller warned that the iPod situation might not be as clear cut as Samsung isn’t sure if it has attacked previous generation iPods in sufficiently clear form.
“Judge Grewal’s warning to Apple that it should not waste everyone’s time by opposing the addition of the iPad 4 and iPad Mini therefore does not necessarily apply to the iPod question,” explained Mueller. “It’s a threshold issue.”
Despite this Mueller added: “I think Samsung also has a pretty good chance of its motion being granted.”
Earlier this week, the same judge ordered Apple and HTC to reveal their ten-year patent licensing agreement to Samsung’s lawyers, but not the general public. Samsung had argued the deal would cover some of the patents involved in its dispute with Apple, which said it had no problem reve
In a previous trial, a US court ordered Samsung to pay Apple £600 million in damages for infringing on various Apple patents in the design of Samsung’s own tablet computers and smartphones. Samsung is trying to overturn the verdict by arguing that Velvin Hogan, the jury foreman, failed to disclose litigation in which he was involved that could have indicated bias against Samsung.
A hearing is scheduled for 6 December in a California courthouse to hear Samsung’s argument that juror misconduct should prompt a judge to order a new trial.
How much do you know about smartphones? Take our quiz!
Swedish telecoms giant Ericsson blamed “challenging mobile networks market” and “further volume contraction” for job…
Dramatic downfall. Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison for masterminding $8bn fraud that…
Fallout avoidance? Tesla buyers in the US must be shown how to use the FSD…
Amazon completes its $4bn investment into AI firm Anthropic, after providing an additional $2.75bn in…
While AI promises unparalleled efficiency, productivity, and innovation, questions regarding its environmental impact loom large.…
Shares in Donald Trump’s social media company rose about 16 percent after first day of…