Home Secretary Defends Phone And Internet Surveillance Proposals

Home secretary Theresa May has defended proposals which would allow GCHQ to track mobile communications and online activity without a warrant.

The legislation, which is expected to be announced in the Queen’s Speech in May, received criticism from various MPs and campaign groups yesterday who said the measures would infringe on rights.

Nationwide monitoring

Theresa May, writing in The Sun today, stood up for the changes, which would cost £2 billion over 10 years, by saying they were needed to “help the police stay one step ahead of criminals”.

“Looking at who a suspect talks to can lead the police to other criminals. Whole paedophile rings, criminal conspiracies and terrorist plots can then be smashed,” May said. “Data like this has already helped lock away murderer Ian Huntley. It helped catch the gangland thugs who gunned down Rhys Jones.”

“Last year, police smashed a major international child pornography website based in Lincolnshire. They then used internet data analysis to find other suspected paedophiles.”

She emphasised that GCHQ would not be creating a database of private information and would not be looking through the content of messages, arguing that the proposals were directly aimed at cracking down on criminals.

Fellow Conservative party member David Davis, also writing in The Sun, objected to this message however, saying the new legislation was unnecessary and would turn Britain into a “nation of suspects”.

“Whenever a government announces plans to snoop on British citizens, the argument is always the same – it needs the new law to stop terrorists,” Davis said. “But we already have a law which lets the secret services eavesdrop on suspected criminals and terrorists.”

“The new law does not focus on terrorists or criminals. It would instead allow civil servants to monitor every innocent, ordinary person in Britain, and all without a warrant.”

How much do you know about IT security? Test your knowledge with our quiz.

Jiten Karia

View Comments

  • Well Theresa May may feel it is all right to invade peoples privacy with new Laws,but I dont!
    I have never voted for labour before but I will be voting for them now, providing of course they don't have plans to do something similar.

  • If “Data like this has already helped lock away murderer Ian Huntley. It helped catch the gangland thugs who gunned down Rhys Jones.” then why do we need any changes, the systems in place now already seem to work?

Recent Posts

Ericsson To Cut 1,200 Jobs in Sweden Amid ‘Challenging’ Market

Swedish telecoms giant Ericsson blamed “challenging mobile networks market” and “further volume contraction” for job…

4 hours ago

FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison For $8bn Fraud

Dramatic downfall. Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison for masterminding $8bn fraud that…

5 hours ago

Elon Musk Orders FSD Demo For Every Tesla US Sale

Fallout avoidance? Tesla buyers in the US must be shown how to use the FSD…

6 hours ago

Amazon Pumps Another $2.75 Billion Into Anthropic

Amazon completes its $4bn investment into AI firm Anthropic, after providing an additional $2.75bn in…

8 hours ago

The Sustainability of AI

While AI promises unparalleled efficiency, productivity, and innovation, questions regarding its environmental impact loom large.…

11 hours ago

Trump’s Truth Social Makes Successful Market Debut

Shares in Donald Trump’s social media company rose about 16 percent after first day of…

11 hours ago