Government Admits Building Cyber-Weapons

The British government has acknowledged it has begun work on a “toolbox” of offensive cyber-weapons to complement its existing defensive capabilities.

In an interview with The Guardian, armed forces minister Nick Harvey said he now regards cyber-weapons as “an integral part of the country’s armoury”.

Battlefield of the future

He said action in cyberspace would form “part of the future battlefield”, comparing ICT weapons to those existing in other forms.

“The circumstances and manner in which we would use (cyber weapons) are broadly analogous to what we would do in any other domain,” Harvey told the paper. “Cyber is a new domain but the rules and norms, the logic and the standards that operate in any other domain… translate across into cyberspace.”

Harvey said the UK’s reliance on IT at the heart of its transport, power and communications systems meant that cyber warfare was now a “catastrophic” possibility.

“The consequences of a well planned, well executed attack against our digital infrastructure could be catastrophic,” Harvey told the Guardian. “With nuclear or biological weapons, the technical threshold is high. With cyber the finger hovering over the button could be anyone from a state to a student.”

Harvey did not specify the source of possible attacks, but said that “it would be foolish to assume the West can always dictate the pace and direction of cyber-technology”, noting in particular China’s development on the military and technological front.

In February foreign secretary William Hague noted that the Foreign Office had repelled a cyber-attack in January from a hostile government agency, which the Guardian, citing unnamed sources, suggested may have originated in China.

Government attacks

Chancellor George Osborne also recently highlighted cyber-attacks on the government, saying that the Treasury had sustained at least one attack per day last year.

US defence giant Lockheed Martin last week also acknowledged an attempted intrusion into its systems.

Security experts said that the government’s move was probably necessary, given the rising atmosphere of threat around high-profile cyber-attacks and cyber-espionage, but some warned that the government might end up making half-baked security manoeuvres.

“Sooner or later, political expediency will mean that mistakes will be made,” said David Harley, senior research fellow at security provider ESET UK, in a statement. “The whole ‘security theatre’ problem is based on the political assumption that it’s better to do something visible but half-baked than to do something effective but invisible.”

Harley said the shape of future warfare remains to be defined, and said it would be a mistake to think that Stuxnet is the direction in which online warfare is heading.

Stuxnet “points to a need to think – or rethink – our assumptions about what these cyberterms mean, because those assumptions and definitions will shape whether we respond appropriately to any and all of these classes of threat,” Harley stated.

Security strategy

Last year’s national security overhaul made cyber-security a “Tier 1” priority.

Home Secretary Theresa May said at the time that cyber warfare is a “new and growing threat” and that more than half of the cyber attacks ever identified had occurred the previous year.

“It’s a threat to government, it’s a threat to businesses and indeed to personal security,” May told Radio 4. “We have identified this as a new and growing threat in the UK.”

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

View Comments

  • UK Government Admits Building Cyber-Weapons you say? Don’t make me laugh with the lack of understanding they have of IT this is no real threat to any other country except theirs.

    Here is a link to proof Data, which shows how the UK Governments lack of understanding as to ‘Copyright Law’ coupled with their much hyped ‘Digital Rights Act’ etc, could have caused a collapse of the Global Economy:

    In short fools in high places are very dangerous indeed as they know NOT what they really do.

    Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk

Recent Posts

New US Export Controls Target China Semiconductor Firms

US introduces export controls on design software and substrate materials to block Chinese companies from…

21 hours ago

US Judge Approves Apple Settlement In Retail Class Action Lawsuit

US federal judge approves settlement offered by Apple in nearly decade-old case over compensation for…

21 hours ago

Ola Plans Premium Electric Car For Indian Market

SoftBank-backed ride-hailing firm Ola Electric announces range of electric cars starting in 2024 following success…

22 hours ago

Faraday Future Raises Fresh Backing For Electric SUV Debut

Electric car start-up Faraday Future looks to raise up to $600m in new funds as…

22 hours ago

India’s Mahindra Launches Electric SUVs Based On VW Platform

India's Mahindra & Mahindra launches range of five electric SUVs based on VW's open MEB…

23 hours ago

Snapchat Hits 1 Million Paid Users Amidst Weak Ad Market

Snapchat parent Snap says paid subscription service reaches 1 million subscribers as weak ad market…

23 hours ago