According to a recent news report, the FBI is warning law enforcement personnel about limiting their exposure on social media accounts. The article cites potential threats from hacktivists in relation to the recent Baltimore riots.

This story is an example of the evolution of hacktivism – the act of hacking for politically or socially motivated purposes. What had years ago been considered almost a benign activity, hacktivism is increasingly being used as a tool for terrorist groups and similar factions to spread propaganda.

Hacktivism as Assymetric Warfare

The Internet has always been a militarised environment where governments and other groups play out their agendas.  After all, the tools for creating havoc are readily available online.

Commercial enterprises often find themselves as pawns in international disputes, or as collateral damage from attempts to disrupt the assets of opposing groups and beliefs.

The only real surprise is that so many commercial and government groups believe they are immune from cyber-warfare or think they are of no interest to warring parties. The truth is, everyone with an Internet connection operates on a shared resource, and are therefore subject to being affected by the many cyber attacks occurring every day.

The Internet also creates opportunities for parties of limited resources to conduct asymmetric warfare and create significant damage with little risk of reprisal.  Groups bent on anarchism or the destruction of the status quo have significant capabilities within the online realm.

Both government and commercial enterprises can defend themselves from the actions of hacktivists, but it usually requires more focus and resources than many organisations are willing to provide. At least until they find themselves victims of a cyber attack.  But even then, few organisations learn their lesson, and most are attacked and compromised repeatedly because they mistakenly believe that real cyber defence is impossible or impractical.

In some cases (i.e. Target, Sony Pictures and others), only after a change in management do we generally see organisations implement appropriate culture, process and technology to provide reasonable defence against cyber attacks.

Given how easy it is to obtain offensive cyber weapons, and how little consequence there is for their use, we may see some horrific outcomes in cyberspace along the lines of a cyber-Pearl Harbour. Maybe then governments would be motivated to implement effective cyber security technologies, laws and policies.

Philip Lieberman is CEO of Lieberman Software Corporation

Are you a security expert? Try our quiz!

TechWeekEurope Staff

Recent Posts

Ericsson To Cut 1,200 Jobs in Sweden Amid ‘Challenging’ Market

Swedish telecoms giant Ericsson blamed “challenging mobile networks market” and “further volume contraction” for job…

2 hours ago

FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison For $8bn Fraud

Dramatic downfall. Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison for masterminding $8bn fraud that…

3 hours ago

Elon Musk Orders FSD Demo For Every Tesla US Sale

Fallout avoidance? Tesla buyers in the US must be shown how to use the FSD…

4 hours ago

Amazon Pumps Another $2.75 Billion Into Anthropic

Amazon completes its $4bn investment into AI firm Anthropic, after providing an additional $2.75bn in…

6 hours ago

The Sustainability of AI

While AI promises unparalleled efficiency, productivity, and innovation, questions regarding its environmental impact loom large.…

9 hours ago

Trump’s Truth Social Makes Successful Market Debut

Shares in Donald Trump’s social media company rose about 16 percent after first day of…

9 hours ago