California Bans Facial Recognition From Police Body Cams

Concern at the use of facial recognition technology continues as California lawmakers ban its use for the body cameras used by state and local law enforcement officers.

It comes after civil rights campaign group in the US called ACLU ran a picture of every California state legislator through a facial-recognition program that matches facial pictures to a database of 25,000 criminal mugshots.

The test saw the facial recognition program falsely flag 26 legislators as criminals. And to make matters worse, more than half of the falsely matched lawmakers were people of colour, according to the ACLU.

California ban

Officials in San Francisco have already banned the use of facial recognition technology, meaning that local agencies, such as the local police force and other city agencies such as transportation would not be able to utilise the technology in any of their systems.

But now this ban looks set to be expanded to the whole of California, which is the most populous state in America.

The bill, AB 1215, which also referred to as the Body Camera Accountability Act, has been officially passed by the California Assembly and now it is up to Governor Gavin Newsom, who must decide whether or not to sign it into law by 13 October.

If he agrees, the bill will go into effect in January 2020, and it will last three years.

During this period, the bill prohibits the use of biometric surveillance technology, which includes facial-recognition software, in police body cameras. It also prohibits police from taking body-camera footage and running it through facial-recognition software at a later time, CNN reported.

But it does not prevent state and local police from using facial-recognition technology in other ways, such as in stationary cameras, and it does not apply to federal agencies such as the FBI.

Privacy concerns

The use of facial-recognition continues to cause privacy concerns around the world.

Earlier this month the High Court in the UK ruled the use of automated facial recognition (AFR) by South Wales Police was lawful.

In July the information commissioner’s office (ICO) said it was carrying out an investigation into trials of facial recognition by police forces, including those in London and South Wales.

Facial-recognition has been previously criticised in the US after research by the Government Accountability Office found that FBI algorithms were inaccurate 14 percent of the time, as well as being more likely to misidentify black people.

Microsoft for example has refused to install facial recognition technology for a US police force, due to concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) bias.

It also reportedly deleted a large facial recognition database, that was said to have contained 10 million images that were used to train facial recognition systems.

Can you protect your privacy online? Take our quiz!

Tom Jowitt

Tom Jowitt is a leading British tech freelancer and long standing contributor to Silicon UK. He is also a bit of a Lord of the Rings nut...

Recent Posts

ACLU File Lawsuit Against Clearview AI

American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against facial recognition firm alleging “privacy-destroying surveillance…

24 hours ago

Cisco Acquires ThousandEyes For Network Monitoring

Networking giant Cisco Systems opens its cheque book to acquire well estalished network intelligence software…

1 day ago

Trump Targets Twitter With Executive Order

Escalating row between Twitter and the White House sees tech firm call out US President…

1 day ago

Is Video Conferencing Secure Enough?

The COVID-19 crisis has seen an explosion in video and teleconferencing service use. Looking into…

1 day ago

Can Your WAN Cope?

As remote working becomes the norm for many businesses, what does this mean for network…

1 day ago

Coronavirus: Google To Reopen Some Offices In July

Sundar Pichai tells staff that Google intends to open some offices starting from 6 July,…

2 days ago