US Judge Approves Apple Settlement In Retail Class Action Lawsuit

A US federal judge has approved Apple’s settlement in a nearly decade-old class action lawsuit in which Apple Store retail staff contested the company’s bag check policy.

The settlement approved by US District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco will mean an average payout of $1,328 (£1,100) to the staff involved and a $10m payment to the lawyers in the case.

Two former Apple Store employees filed the lawsuit in California in 2013, claiming they should be paid for the time they spent in required security procedures.

Apple’s policies required that staff bags, purses, backpacks briefcases and personal Apple devices be searched to ensure employees weren’t carrying out theft, but staff said the procedures forced them to wait as long as 45 minutes before they were allowed to leave the premises, time for which they were not paid.

Apple store Towson, Maryland

‘Is this true?’

Papers filed in the lawsuit in 2015 revealed that Apple chief executive Tim Cook was unaware of the policies.

The documents said that at least two retail employees had complained directly to Cook about the procedures, and that Cook had forwarded the complaints to senior retail and human resources executives, asking, “Is this true?”

A California judge dismissed the lawsuit in 2015, but after an appeal the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals asked the California Supreme Court to clarify the law.

In February 2020 the California Supreme Court ruled that state law requires employees to be paid for the time they spend in mandatory security checks.

Decade-long litigation

When Alsup initially dismissed the case in 2015 he found that compensation wasn’t required because workers were not obliged to bring personal items to work that would then have to be screened.

The 2020 California Supreme Court ruling decided, by contrast, that compensation was necessary because it was unrealistic to expect employees not to bring personal items to work.

Alsup wrote that the settlement offered “significant monetary recovery” to the plaintiffs and that the recovery was “fair, reasonable, and adequate”.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Ericsson To Cut 1,200 Jobs in Sweden Amid ‘Challenging’ Market

Swedish telecoms giant Ericsson blamed “challenging mobile networks market” and “further volume contraction” for job…

1 hour ago

FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison For $8bn Fraud

Dramatic downfall. Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison for masterminding $8bn fraud that…

2 hours ago

Elon Musk Orders FSD Demo For Every Tesla US Sale

Fallout avoidance? Tesla buyers in the US must be shown how to use the FSD…

3 hours ago

Amazon Pumps Another $2.75 Billion Into Anthropic

Amazon completes its $4bn investment into AI firm Anthropic, after providing an additional $2.75bn in…

5 hours ago

The Sustainability of AI

While AI promises unparalleled efficiency, productivity, and innovation, questions regarding its environmental impact loom large.…

7 hours ago

Trump’s Truth Social Makes Successful Market Debut

Shares in Donald Trump’s social media company rose about 16 percent after first day of…

8 hours ago