Elon Musk also signs open letter along with hundreds of top robotic scientists pleading military powers to curtail plans for AI drones
A ban on offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control, such as AI drones, should be implemented to save humanity from a military AI arms race.
This is according to an open letter signed by some of the world’s greatest thinkers, including Stephen Hawking, PayPal and Tesla founder Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, amongst hundreds of others top AI and robotic scientists.
The letter, on behalf of the Future Of Life Institute, calls governments to consider the detrimental effects of artificial intelligence-controlled drones and robots.
“If any major military power pushes ahead with AI weapon development, a global arms race is virtually inevitable,” reads the letter, to be announced on July 28 at the International Joint Conferences for Artificial Intelligence 2015 event in Argentina.
“The endpoint of this technological trajectory is obvious: autonomous weapons will become the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow. It will only be a matter of time until they appear on the black market and in the hands of terrorists, dictators wishing to better control their populace, warlords wishing to perpetrate ethnic cleansing. We therefore believe that a military AI arms race would not be beneficial for humanity. There are many ways in which AI can make battlefields safer for humans, especially civilians, without creating new tools for killing people.”
In June, the Future Of Life Institute announced its intentions to spend a $10 million (£6.5m) donation from Elon Musk to help fund 37 projects that are dedicated to using artificial intelligence for the benefit of humankind.
Other signatories of the letter, which is titled ‘Autonomous Weapons: an Open Letter from AI & Robotics Researchers’, include political philosopher Noam Chomsky and Jaan Tallinn, the co-founder of Skype.
“Just as most chemists and biologists have no interest in building chemical or biological weapons, most AI researchers have no interest in building AI weapons — and do not want others to tarnish their field by doing so, potentially creating a major public backlash against AI that curtails its future societal benefits.
“In summary, we believe that AI has great potential to benefit humanity in many ways, and that the goal of the field should be to do so. Starting a military AI arms race is a bad idea, and should be prevented by a ban on offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control.”