Execs Divided Over Oracle’s Acquisition Of MySQL
With its newly acquired Sun intellectual property and R&D in hand, Oracle is moving headlong into new territory, but the MySQL acquisition continues to cause controversy
Can MySQL continue to innovate under the “rule” of Oracle?
“Yes, we believe MySQL will live on under the rule of Oracle. Oracle will allow innovation of MySQL, but it might be at a different pace due to Oracle’s public-company, corporate status,” Alston said.
In its 21 January decision to allow Oracle-Sun to do business in the 27-member European Union, European Commission regulators ruled that many database users consider PostgreSQL to be a “credible alternative” to MySQL, and that MySQL is not the only highly regarded open source database.
“It appears as though the European Commission never fully understood the competitive issues surrounding MySQL,” Alston said. “MySQL was built by developers for quick and dirty applications with simple scripting languages, and it’s not ready for true enterprise IT developers.
“While it’s true that PostgreSQL can handle any of the lightweight processing that MySQL was designed for, in reality PostgreSQL is a full-featured open source database built for high-transaction, highly scalable enterprise applications. Essentially, PostgreSQL and MySQL were designed for two different workloads.”
Roger Burkhardt, CEO of the much older, more established Ingres database, believes that Oracle will shape MySQL to fit its business needs – ahead of any community wishes.
“Oracle is going to reshape the MySQL business and channel it in ways that protects its proprietary software business and supports its move into hardware,” Burkhardt told eWEEK. “Evidence of this is already there: MySQL have removed the migration assets from their website that would support a move from Oracle to MySQL.
“It was removed in recent weeks to reduce choice for their customers before the deal was approved or closed. Oracle clearly wants to take no risk in cannibalising their Oracle DBMS business, even though MySQL is a much less capable product.
Burkhardt also said that he understands that MySQL has already stopped reselling and promoting other products based on MySQL that are competitive with Oracle’s database offerings.
“The good news is there is a proven alternative to Oracle’s database. Ingres has the technology, migration tools, and global partners to support smooth migrations from proprietary databases to the benefits of open source,” he said.
EC’s decision was politically driven
Florian Mueller, a longtime open source activist and colleague of MySQL creator Michael “Monty” Widenius, told eWEEK that the EC’s decision was “really one of politics.”
“Oracle still needs clearance from the Chinese and Russian antitrust authorities, and it’s a matter of respect not to consider this process finished until those major jurisdictions have also taken and announced their decisions,” Mueller told eWEEK.
“The EC’s reasoning has to be reviewed when all the details of the decision are known, but it seems to be a decision based on wishful thinking for the future more so than anything else. PostgreSQL has been around for decades without having had its mainstream breakthrough, so the EC can’t seriously claim that PostgreSQL could replace MySQL as a competitive force,” Mueller said.
“Forks (derived works based on an existing open source project) are a legal possibility but there’s no reason to assume that any MySQL fork, or even a number of such forks collectively, could threaten Oracle to the extent that MySQL could.”
