ANALYSIS: Apple & Android smartphones that lack augmented security measures leave high-priority hacking targets, such as President Donald Trump, vulnerable
There’s a growing consensus among security professionals here in Washington, DC that the single most likely spot for President Donald Trump to have had his phone tapped isn’t at Trump Tower. Instead it’s his unsecured Android phone that he uses to access Twitter.
In fact, due to the ease with which mobile devices can be breached through social media and communications apps such as What’s App, the President could have easily downloaded a Trojan that can record anything that is said near the phone or than can use the phone’s camera. Such a Trojan can be delivered in seconds, erase all traces of the infection and remain resident without detection.
The task, in the words of Georgia Weidman, founder and CTO of Shevirah, Inc. is “trivial.” Shevirah makes a penetration testing tool called Dagah that allow enterprises to test their mobile devices and their security environment for weaknesses.
As to who might unleash such a Trojan, the fact is that it could have been nearly anyone. The ease with which older models of Android phones, such as the President’s Samsung Galaxy, can be compromised has been known to security researchers and cyber-criminals for years. The leak of the FBI’s mobile penetration tools confirmed this, but it’s been known for some time.
As serious as the potential for breaking into the President’s cell phone might be, for most organizations, the ease with which their own mobile devices can be penetrated is of even greater concern. That’s because in many organizations there are few controls that limit mobile device access, meaning that penetrating even one mobile device can give hackers the keys to the kingdom.
The news gets only worse. In addition to Trojans, mobile devices are as susceptible to phishing attacks just as any other devices that can receive email. But for mobile devices, the phishing can come from text messages, communications apps, social media and pretty much anywhere a mobile device can receive a message.
A favorite attack vector for mobile devices are social media apps, such as Twitter. Malware can arrive through a link in a Twitter message that’s indistinguishable from any other type of link. But the same thing can happen through messages in What’s App, Facebook Messenger or Skype.
While incoming email can be filtered by firewalls and other security methods, messaging arrives without a filter because it’s coming directly from another device, not through the corporate network. Weidman told me that she’s developed a series of messaging simulations that can test both the ability of the device to keep out malware and the ability of the device’s user to recognize phishing when it shows up.
Weidman has developed a suite of penetration testing tools that can get past the normal safeguards of iOS and recent versions of Android. “It allows you to simulate the same sort of attacks,” she said. “You can do it all in a controlled environment, and add it into your other security programs.”
Despite a wide belief that Apple’s iOS is immune to penetration, it’s not. “We can simulate a malicious application on iOS,” Weidman explained, noting that “Apple has done a fantastic job of using cryptography to make sure it can’t be penetrated.” But she said that she’s found a way to follow Apple’s guidance and rules and still install malware on an iOS device through using services designed for developers.
Originally published on eWeek
And what about Android? Find out on page 2…